<p>The cohort included a total of 411 Cochrane protocols and 379 (90.5%) remained after excluding 39. Of these protocols, 19.1% (71/372) were never published as full Cochrane reviews while 80.9% (301/372) were published in full.</p
Background: The validity of research synthesis is threatened if published studies comprise a biased ...
Abstract Failure to identify all relevant reports of controlled trials is a potential source of bias...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
Cochrane reviews are regarded as being scientifically rigorous and are increasingly used by a variet...
Context Publication of research protocols minimizes bias by explicitly stating a priori hypotheses a...
Objectives: To determine the extent to which abstracts of methodology research, initially presented ...
Objective: To calculate the typical time taken to complete protocols and reviews, to track how often...
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which abstracts of methodology research, initially presented ...
OBJECTIVES: To describe the types of report that are cited by protocols and reviews included in the ...
Background: Cochrane reviews are regarded as scientifically rigorous, yet a review’s time to publica...
<p>A protocol was devised for the systematic study, and the searches were performed in the MEDLINE®,...
Objective To examine how poor reporting and inadequate methods for key methodological features in ra...
CONTEXT: Publication of research protocols minimizes bias by explicitly stating a priori hypotheses ...
<p>Of 647 citations identified, 480 were excluded after reviewing titles and abstracts. Full-text re...
Background:\u201cWithout Cochrane Reviews, people making decisions are unlikely to be able to access...
Background: The validity of research synthesis is threatened if published studies comprise a biased ...
Abstract Failure to identify all relevant reports of controlled trials is a potential source of bias...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
Cochrane reviews are regarded as being scientifically rigorous and are increasingly used by a variet...
Context Publication of research protocols minimizes bias by explicitly stating a priori hypotheses a...
Objectives: To determine the extent to which abstracts of methodology research, initially presented ...
Objective: To calculate the typical time taken to complete protocols and reviews, to track how often...
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which abstracts of methodology research, initially presented ...
OBJECTIVES: To describe the types of report that are cited by protocols and reviews included in the ...
Background: Cochrane reviews are regarded as scientifically rigorous, yet a review’s time to publica...
<p>A protocol was devised for the systematic study, and the searches were performed in the MEDLINE®,...
Objective To examine how poor reporting and inadequate methods for key methodological features in ra...
CONTEXT: Publication of research protocols minimizes bias by explicitly stating a priori hypotheses ...
<p>Of 647 citations identified, 480 were excluded after reviewing titles and abstracts. Full-text re...
Background:\u201cWithout Cochrane Reviews, people making decisions are unlikely to be able to access...
Background: The validity of research synthesis is threatened if published studies comprise a biased ...
Abstract Failure to identify all relevant reports of controlled trials is a potential source of bias...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a su...
DOI
Add to ORKG