<p>Plots represent the ERP activities (left) and the corresponding scatter plots of their peak times (right). In both brain regions the peak latency of the ERP components increased with increasing the number of irrelevant objects and correlated with participants' RT. In scatter plots asterisks demonstrate values corresponding to whole report (WR) trials and squares depict values of partial report (PR) trials. The numbers close to each square show the amount of irrelevant load in each PR trial. Colour legends are the same for the scatter plots and the ERP plot. Lines in part c and d demonstrate the regression line.</p
<p>There were no statistically significant differences (<i>P</i>>0.05) in the N100-AEP latencies bet...
<p>Topographical plots of the difference in brain activity between rapid and delayed trials. Depicte...
<p>Brain electrical activity mapping (incongruent minus congruent) for the mean amplitude values of ...
<p>Parietal N200 peak latency in right hemisphere showed better correlation to participants' RT. Eac...
<p>Activity mappings also demonstrate distribution of frontal (b) and parietal (d) activities during...
<p>Mean peak-latencies in milliseconds (± SD) for the frontal novelty-P3 and the centro-parietal odd...
(A) Group averaged ERPs ± standard error are shown at frontal (F3, F4) and parietal (P3, P4) channel...
<p>ERP amplitudes are plotted for different RT groups by task and stimulus type (congruous vs. incon...
<p>Statistical results on peak latency in the visual cortex, superior parietal lobe (SPL), inferior ...
<p>a) target on the left; b) target on the right. Black line represents congruent trials and red lin...
<p>(A) Topography of the ERP difference from the contrast of color-naming versus word-reading trials...
<p>Top: A, B, C, E - mean peak amplitudes for A. Color/Luminance (exp I); B. Phase offset (exp II); ...
Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of P300 latency confound a...
Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of P300 latency confound a...
Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of P300 latency confound a...
<p>There were no statistically significant differences (<i>P</i>>0.05) in the N100-AEP latencies bet...
<p>Topographical plots of the difference in brain activity between rapid and delayed trials. Depicte...
<p>Brain electrical activity mapping (incongruent minus congruent) for the mean amplitude values of ...
<p>Parietal N200 peak latency in right hemisphere showed better correlation to participants' RT. Eac...
<p>Activity mappings also demonstrate distribution of frontal (b) and parietal (d) activities during...
<p>Mean peak-latencies in milliseconds (± SD) for the frontal novelty-P3 and the centro-parietal odd...
(A) Group averaged ERPs ± standard error are shown at frontal (F3, F4) and parietal (P3, P4) channel...
<p>ERP amplitudes are plotted for different RT groups by task and stimulus type (congruous vs. incon...
<p>Statistical results on peak latency in the visual cortex, superior parietal lobe (SPL), inferior ...
<p>a) target on the left; b) target on the right. Black line represents congruent trials and red lin...
<p>(A) Topography of the ERP difference from the contrast of color-naming versus word-reading trials...
<p>Top: A, B, C, E - mean peak amplitudes for A. Color/Luminance (exp I); B. Phase offset (exp II); ...
Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of P300 latency confound a...
Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of P300 latency confound a...
Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, and Hoorman (1994) suggested that common measures of P300 latency confound a...
<p>There were no statistically significant differences (<i>P</i>>0.05) in the N100-AEP latencies bet...
<p>Topographical plots of the difference in brain activity between rapid and delayed trials. Depicte...
<p>Brain electrical activity mapping (incongruent minus congruent) for the mean amplitude values of ...