<p>Female dominance, sexual dimorphism and percentage of males in the group. Regression analyses (slopes and p-values) for raw data and independent contrasts branch length based on Purvis <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678#pone.0002678-Purvis1" target="_blank">[80]</a>. For empirical data see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678#pone-0002678-t004" target="_blank">Table 4</a>. FemDom = female dominance, SexDim = sexual dimorphism, % Males = percentage of males in the group.</p
<p>Notes: This table reports regression coefficients from the additive model, estimated separately f...
<p>Grouping was treated as a binary variable combining S and FF to compare with SFF. Variation in gr...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
<p>SexDim = sexual dimorphism. NS = ‘not significant’,<sup>*</sup> = p<0.05, <sup>**</sup> = p<0.01,...
<p>Condition: n = natural, f = free ranging, c = captive. SexDim = sexual dimorphism. FemDom = Femal...
<p>b) Female dominance and male biased sexual dimorphism (weight male/ weight female). AloPal = <i>A...
<p>(A) Plot of multivariate regression of Procrustes shape coordinates on Centroid size showing diff...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
Fig A. Imbalance between studies of sexual selection in males and females. Fig B. Methodological pre...
<p>For longitudinal studies, the relative CV in group sizes were calculated as the residuals of a re...
<p>* p<0.05</p><p>** p<0.01</p><p>*** p<0.001.</p><p>Logistic regression analysis results for the Fe...
<p>Regression analyses of personality variables predicting mate poaching in men and women (Study 1)....
<p>* p<0.05</p><p>** p<0.01</p><p>*** p<0.0.</p><p>Logistic regression analysis results for the Male...
<p>Intensity of aggression (StepDom) of males = 1, of females = 0.1, initial dominance of females an...
<p>Regression analyses of personality variables predicting mate poaching in men and women (Study 2)....
<p>Notes: This table reports regression coefficients from the additive model, estimated separately f...
<p>Grouping was treated as a binary variable combining S and FF to compare with SFF. Variation in gr...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
<p>SexDim = sexual dimorphism. NS = ‘not significant’,<sup>*</sup> = p<0.05, <sup>**</sup> = p<0.01,...
<p>Condition: n = natural, f = free ranging, c = captive. SexDim = sexual dimorphism. FemDom = Femal...
<p>b) Female dominance and male biased sexual dimorphism (weight male/ weight female). AloPal = <i>A...
<p>(A) Plot of multivariate regression of Procrustes shape coordinates on Centroid size showing diff...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
Fig A. Imbalance between studies of sexual selection in males and females. Fig B. Methodological pre...
<p>For longitudinal studies, the relative CV in group sizes were calculated as the residuals of a re...
<p>* p<0.05</p><p>** p<0.01</p><p>*** p<0.001.</p><p>Logistic regression analysis results for the Fe...
<p>Regression analyses of personality variables predicting mate poaching in men and women (Study 1)....
<p>* p<0.05</p><p>** p<0.01</p><p>*** p<0.0.</p><p>Logistic regression analysis results for the Male...
<p>Intensity of aggression (StepDom) of males = 1, of females = 0.1, initial dominance of females an...
<p>Regression analyses of personality variables predicting mate poaching in men and women (Study 2)....
<p>Notes: This table reports regression coefficients from the additive model, estimated separately f...
<p>Grouping was treated as a binary variable combining S and FF to compare with SFF. Variation in gr...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...