<p>There were statistically significant (p<0.05) differences between all groups with the exception of the control and MCI-Nonconverter group, and the AD and MCI-Converter group. Note the overall pattern of negative activation magnitude in the Control and MCI-Nonconverter groups, and positive activation magnitude in the AD and MCI-Converter groups.</p
<p>Overview of peak MNI coordinates for areas of significant activation for the two main contrasts: ...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Conjunction (shared activations) of O-MI and O-IMIT are displayed in the left two columns. The re...
<p>Scatterplots demonstrate activation magnitude parameter estimate in the PMC region (on the y-axis...
<p>A – appearance of the monitor when matching after negative feedback and matching in the control c...
<p>A – appearance of the monitor when matching after positive feedback and matching in the control c...
<p>Each row represents a component (IC-1 (a-c), IC-2 (d-f), IC-3 (g-i) and IC-4 (j-l)). The first co...
<p>Brain regions showing decreased connectivity to PCC in MCI group comparing to control group. Left...
<p>Regions of decreased connectivity to the PCC in MCI subjects comparing to controls.</p
Bar graphs show the percentage of participants in each treatment group reporting the specified maxim...
<p>The proportion of deactivators was significantly different (p<0.05) across diagnostic groups afte...
<p>All reported activations are based on anatomical ROI analysis and significant at <i>p</i><.05 (FW...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Panel A illustrates significant cluster of MEG sensors (p<sub>cluster</sub><0.05) obtained after ...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Overview of peak MNI coordinates for areas of significant activation for the two main contrasts: ...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Conjunction (shared activations) of O-MI and O-IMIT are displayed in the left two columns. The re...
<p>Scatterplots demonstrate activation magnitude parameter estimate in the PMC region (on the y-axis...
<p>A – appearance of the monitor when matching after negative feedback and matching in the control c...
<p>A – appearance of the monitor when matching after positive feedback and matching in the control c...
<p>Each row represents a component (IC-1 (a-c), IC-2 (d-f), IC-3 (g-i) and IC-4 (j-l)). The first co...
<p>Brain regions showing decreased connectivity to PCC in MCI group comparing to control group. Left...
<p>Regions of decreased connectivity to the PCC in MCI subjects comparing to controls.</p
Bar graphs show the percentage of participants in each treatment group reporting the specified maxim...
<p>The proportion of deactivators was significantly different (p<0.05) across diagnostic groups afte...
<p>All reported activations are based on anatomical ROI analysis and significant at <i>p</i><.05 (FW...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Panel A illustrates significant cluster of MEG sensors (p<sub>cluster</sub><0.05) obtained after ...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Overview of peak MNI coordinates for areas of significant activation for the two main contrasts: ...
<p>Note: x,y,z coordinates in units of mm; PSC: percent signal change of the group average of each s...
<p>Conjunction (shared activations) of O-MI and O-IMIT are displayed in the left two columns. The re...