<p>Ranks of All Classification Methods Used in This Study in Ten Cross-Validation Experiments</p
<p>Classification rates using ten-fold cross-validation (10-fold) versus using only the 1<sup>st</su...
<p>The last row shows the total number of ranking points across all datasets and two classifiers (NB...
<p>Accuracy percentages of six different classifiers used after the first selection stage in 10-fold...
<p>Ranking of different algorithms with respect to the median AUC in a 10 times repeated 10-fold cro...
<p>Ranking of each method, as determined by statistical analysis, by individual sample type and comb...
Rank positions of the quantification methods in our AE experiments, and (between parentheses) the ra...
Rank positions of the quantification methods in our RAE experiments, and (between parentheses) the r...
<p>General method ranking, obtained by sorting methods according to their average ranking across 6 d...
Partial and overall ranks of all estimation methods for various combinations of Θ.</p
<p>10-Fold Cross Validation Accuracy of classification methods with the addition of noisy variables....
<p>Classification results of three methods (%). The highest results of each method are shown in bold...
<p>Pairwise comparisons of classification frequency ranks for the emotion models.</p
<p>The number of subjects in binary task was 12 and the number of subjects in multi-task BCIs was 9....
Summary of the methods included in this benchmark study in alphabetical order.</p
<p>Performances of four different classification methods, combined with 4-fold and Leave-One-Out cro...
<p>Classification rates using ten-fold cross-validation (10-fold) versus using only the 1<sup>st</su...
<p>The last row shows the total number of ranking points across all datasets and two classifiers (NB...
<p>Accuracy percentages of six different classifiers used after the first selection stage in 10-fold...
<p>Ranking of different algorithms with respect to the median AUC in a 10 times repeated 10-fold cro...
<p>Ranking of each method, as determined by statistical analysis, by individual sample type and comb...
Rank positions of the quantification methods in our AE experiments, and (between parentheses) the ra...
Rank positions of the quantification methods in our RAE experiments, and (between parentheses) the r...
<p>General method ranking, obtained by sorting methods according to their average ranking across 6 d...
Partial and overall ranks of all estimation methods for various combinations of Θ.</p
<p>10-Fold Cross Validation Accuracy of classification methods with the addition of noisy variables....
<p>Classification results of three methods (%). The highest results of each method are shown in bold...
<p>Pairwise comparisons of classification frequency ranks for the emotion models.</p
<p>The number of subjects in binary task was 12 and the number of subjects in multi-task BCIs was 9....
Summary of the methods included in this benchmark study in alphabetical order.</p
<p>Performances of four different classification methods, combined with 4-fold and Leave-One-Out cro...
<p>Classification rates using ten-fold cross-validation (10-fold) versus using only the 1<sup>st</su...
<p>The last row shows the total number of ranking points across all datasets and two classifiers (NB...
<p>Accuracy percentages of six different classifiers used after the first selection stage in 10-fold...
DOI
Add to ORKG