<p>F<sub>ST</sub> (as a linear or quadratic predictor) and <i>W</i> (linear predictor) were entered as fixed effects, while sire, dam, and sire x dam interaction effects were entered as random effects. Models incorporating F<sub>ST</sub> or <i>W</i> were then compared to the reference models (indicated in bold). s: sire; d: dam.</p
<p>Pairwise odds ratios (effect size and 95% credible intervals) for proportion of eggs that pupated...
<p>Models tested the prediction that the advantage of large size in aggressive contests for resource...
<p>Hatching success, fledging success and adult sex ratio (Males/Males + Females) compared between h...
<p>Reference models are indicated in bold. To test the effect of treatment, the reference model was ...
<p>Brood and nestling identity were included as a random effects. Two separate models both including...
<p>Estimated parameters from the final selected logistic regression model for the probability of an ...
<p>One model was fitted per cohort. Random effects: Dam; maternal identity. Strain/Fam; family neste...
<p>Hatching success was lowest for sibling matings (light grey), followed by within-population matin...
<p>The random effects were additive genetic (AG), maternal genetic (MG), maternal environmental (ME)...
Comparing predicted breeding values (BV) among animals in different management units (e.g. flocks, h...
ABSTRACT: In this study, a data driven approach was used by applying linear regression and machine l...
All tests for the relationships between clutch size, number of fledglings, and territory density wit...
Model estimates, standard errors (SE), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI (95%)) are provided al...
Comparing predicted breeding values (BV) among animals in different management units (e.g. flocks, ...
<p>For each pair of host species, we (<b>A</b>) calculated the log ratio of their average body masse...
<p>Pairwise odds ratios (effect size and 95% credible intervals) for proportion of eggs that pupated...
<p>Models tested the prediction that the advantage of large size in aggressive contests for resource...
<p>Hatching success, fledging success and adult sex ratio (Males/Males + Females) compared between h...
<p>Reference models are indicated in bold. To test the effect of treatment, the reference model was ...
<p>Brood and nestling identity were included as a random effects. Two separate models both including...
<p>Estimated parameters from the final selected logistic regression model for the probability of an ...
<p>One model was fitted per cohort. Random effects: Dam; maternal identity. Strain/Fam; family neste...
<p>Hatching success was lowest for sibling matings (light grey), followed by within-population matin...
<p>The random effects were additive genetic (AG), maternal genetic (MG), maternal environmental (ME)...
Comparing predicted breeding values (BV) among animals in different management units (e.g. flocks, h...
ABSTRACT: In this study, a data driven approach was used by applying linear regression and machine l...
All tests for the relationships between clutch size, number of fledglings, and territory density wit...
Model estimates, standard errors (SE), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI (95%)) are provided al...
Comparing predicted breeding values (BV) among animals in different management units (e.g. flocks, ...
<p>For each pair of host species, we (<b>A</b>) calculated the log ratio of their average body masse...
<p>Pairwise odds ratios (effect size and 95% credible intervals) for proportion of eggs that pupated...
<p>Models tested the prediction that the advantage of large size in aggressive contests for resource...
<p>Hatching success, fledging success and adult sex ratio (Males/Males + Females) compared between h...