<p>Number of patients: 39 S2 relapsed vs. 39 S2 cured.</p><p>SP%: specificity %; SE%: sensitivity%; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.</p><p>The reported cut-off corresponds to the best combination of specificity and sensitivity obtained for each marker.</p
<p>Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; LR+, Positive Likelihood Rat...
<p>Data from 43 cases and 87 controls. Marker selection criteria: (1) serum marker potential in high...
<p>RR: Risk ratio; WMD: Weighted mean difference. CI: confidence intervals.</p><p>Sensitivity analys...
<p>3 M, 6 M, 12 M: 3, 6, 12 months after treatment.</p><p>Number of patients: 3 M cured n = 113, rel...
<p>At a probability cut-off point of 0.45 both the sensitivity (80%) and specificity (85.3%) for thi...
<p>Training cohort (n = 100): Stage 1 n = 44; Stage 2 n = 56. Early-late stage patients were not inc...
<p><b>NOTE.</b> Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative pred...
BACKGROUND: Optimal cutoff values for tests results involving continuous variables are often derived...
BACKGROUND: Optimal cutoff values for tests results involving continuous variables are often derived...
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC), and cutoff score among all parti...
suggests a role for image heterogeneity markers, with an eye to-ward therapy monitoring. The reprodu...
<p>Primary and sensitivity analyses on effectiveness of therapy in eligible vs. ineligible naive and...
<p>Cut-point – minimum (maximum for prolactin) value (pg/ml) for diagnosis as case at 95% specificit...
1<p>CI, Confidence Interval;</p>2<p>PPV, positive predictive value;</p>3<p>NPV, negative predictive ...
<p>In the non-phenotype specific analyses at various cut-offs for defining hits: SNPs with predictiv...
<p>Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; LR+, Positive Likelihood Rat...
<p>Data from 43 cases and 87 controls. Marker selection criteria: (1) serum marker potential in high...
<p>RR: Risk ratio; WMD: Weighted mean difference. CI: confidence intervals.</p><p>Sensitivity analys...
<p>3 M, 6 M, 12 M: 3, 6, 12 months after treatment.</p><p>Number of patients: 3 M cured n = 113, rel...
<p>At a probability cut-off point of 0.45 both the sensitivity (80%) and specificity (85.3%) for thi...
<p>Training cohort (n = 100): Stage 1 n = 44; Stage 2 n = 56. Early-late stage patients were not inc...
<p><b>NOTE.</b> Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative pred...
BACKGROUND: Optimal cutoff values for tests results involving continuous variables are often derived...
BACKGROUND: Optimal cutoff values for tests results involving continuous variables are often derived...
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC), and cutoff score among all parti...
suggests a role for image heterogeneity markers, with an eye to-ward therapy monitoring. The reprodu...
<p>Primary and sensitivity analyses on effectiveness of therapy in eligible vs. ineligible naive and...
<p>Cut-point – minimum (maximum for prolactin) value (pg/ml) for diagnosis as case at 95% specificit...
1<p>CI, Confidence Interval;</p>2<p>PPV, positive predictive value;</p>3<p>NPV, negative predictive ...
<p>In the non-phenotype specific analyses at various cut-offs for defining hits: SNPs with predictiv...
<p>Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; LR+, Positive Likelihood Rat...
<p>Data from 43 cases and 87 controls. Marker selection criteria: (1) serum marker potential in high...
<p>RR: Risk ratio; WMD: Weighted mean difference. CI: confidence intervals.</p><p>Sensitivity analys...