<p>In both plots, the black curve shows performance of the computational system using distributional similarities (<i>DST</i>), colour & textons for appearance, the MIRRORING algorithm and 512 already-known appearances. The red curve shows baseline chance performance. The horizontal axes show the number of incorrect rival answers that are presented alongside the correct answer. The left hand end of each horizontal axis corresponds to just one rival, which is the condition used in all other experiments (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058074#pone-0058074-g006" target="_blank">figures 6</a> & <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058074#pone-0058074-g007" target="_blank">...
<p>Blue circles used one repetition and red stars three repetitions. (a) Error distributions for the...
<p>Results are plotted separately for (a) author PBH and (b) and (c) two naïve participants. In each...
<p>Reproducibility () vs prediction accuracy curves for two subjects: C Subject S4 (without motor ne...
<p>Plots show correct rates versus number of known appearances for various combinations of word simi...
<p>Plots show correct rates versus number of already-known appearances for the identification and na...
<p>The dashed line represents chance level, which was 50% for both tasks. The left panels (a, c) sho...
<p>Learning curves for the 5 different experimental conditions (<i>Black lines</i>: aggregate number...
<p>Shown are the best and the worst consistencies in using our optimization method to probe the doub...
<p>(A) Mean number of objects correctly guessed by the inquirer over 10 experimental (red) and 10 co...
<p><b>A:</b> net rate of correct answer (y-axis) is shown as a function of species (x-axis) and oppo...
<p><b>A</b>. Pattern of responses. Each dot corresponds to one trial of one participant, where the a...
On average, participants gradually learned to choose outcomes correctly across six runs of scanned l...
A: Performance of each crossover method (line colour) for each problem (row) and number of crossover...
<p>Right eye predominance in the sustained rivalry phase (Experiment 2) is plotted as function of ri...
<p>The correlation between the number of positive, negative, and neutral statements as a function of...
<p>Blue circles used one repetition and red stars three repetitions. (a) Error distributions for the...
<p>Results are plotted separately for (a) author PBH and (b) and (c) two naïve participants. In each...
<p>Reproducibility () vs prediction accuracy curves for two subjects: C Subject S4 (without motor ne...
<p>Plots show correct rates versus number of known appearances for various combinations of word simi...
<p>Plots show correct rates versus number of already-known appearances for the identification and na...
<p>The dashed line represents chance level, which was 50% for both tasks. The left panels (a, c) sho...
<p>Learning curves for the 5 different experimental conditions (<i>Black lines</i>: aggregate number...
<p>Shown are the best and the worst consistencies in using our optimization method to probe the doub...
<p>(A) Mean number of objects correctly guessed by the inquirer over 10 experimental (red) and 10 co...
<p><b>A:</b> net rate of correct answer (y-axis) is shown as a function of species (x-axis) and oppo...
<p><b>A</b>. Pattern of responses. Each dot corresponds to one trial of one participant, where the a...
On average, participants gradually learned to choose outcomes correctly across six runs of scanned l...
A: Performance of each crossover method (line colour) for each problem (row) and number of crossover...
<p>Right eye predominance in the sustained rivalry phase (Experiment 2) is plotted as function of ri...
<p>The correlation between the number of positive, negative, and neutral statements as a function of...
<p>Blue circles used one repetition and red stars three repetitions. (a) Error distributions for the...
<p>Results are plotted separately for (a) author PBH and (b) and (c) two naïve participants. In each...
<p>Reproducibility () vs prediction accuracy curves for two subjects: C Subject S4 (without motor ne...