<p>Animals tested at the same circadian time as training performed better than those tested at a phase 12 hours different from the phase of training. Numbers of animals for each time point ranged from 14 to 17 in A and 10 to 11 in B. Analysis of variance showed significant dependence of performance on the time of testing for training at both CT 2 and CT 14.</p
Estimation of learning curves is ubiquitously based on proportions of correct responses within movin...
<p>Table shows source of dog, breed, sex, sessions to learning the discrimination task, percentage o...
<p><b>A</b>) The outline of the training schedule for the recognition of moving bars. <b>B</b>) Repr...
<p>Each line represents 48 hours. SAT training (ZT4) is relative to the topmost LD bar (where dark b...
<p>LS is identified as the first day with significant performance, i.e. with a significant differenc...
<p><i>(</i><b><i>A</i></b><i>)</i> 24 hour binned average of ZT4 trained animals. SAT training (ZT4)...
<p>SAT training is relative to the topmost LD bar (where dark bar = lights-off). The shaded column r...
<p>(<i>A, B</i>) Schematic representation of the trace (<i>A</i>) and delay (<i>B</i>) conditioning ...
<p>Behavioral performance (% correct responses, upper panel) and reaction times (lower panel) for ea...
<p>A–E. Learning curves for 5 naive marmosets performing an auditory detection task with broad band ...
<p>Number of days to reach criterion: There was no difference in learning performance among the thre...
<p>Diagram of how trainings were performed and time of sample extraction (panel A). Animals from: Co...
<p>(a) <i>Left</i>: time changes in the correct rates for 22 individual rats (gray) were aligned to ...
(a) Mean population activity trajectories (bolded color lines) diverge by trial difficulty. Single t...
<p>Two animals fully trained in the categorization task learned two hitherto unknown categories (<i>...
Estimation of learning curves is ubiquitously based on proportions of correct responses within movin...
<p>Table shows source of dog, breed, sex, sessions to learning the discrimination task, percentage o...
<p><b>A</b>) The outline of the training schedule for the recognition of moving bars. <b>B</b>) Repr...
<p>Each line represents 48 hours. SAT training (ZT4) is relative to the topmost LD bar (where dark b...
<p>LS is identified as the first day with significant performance, i.e. with a significant differenc...
<p><i>(</i><b><i>A</i></b><i>)</i> 24 hour binned average of ZT4 trained animals. SAT training (ZT4)...
<p>SAT training is relative to the topmost LD bar (where dark bar = lights-off). The shaded column r...
<p>(<i>A, B</i>) Schematic representation of the trace (<i>A</i>) and delay (<i>B</i>) conditioning ...
<p>Behavioral performance (% correct responses, upper panel) and reaction times (lower panel) for ea...
<p>A–E. Learning curves for 5 naive marmosets performing an auditory detection task with broad band ...
<p>Number of days to reach criterion: There was no difference in learning performance among the thre...
<p>Diagram of how trainings were performed and time of sample extraction (panel A). Animals from: Co...
<p>(a) <i>Left</i>: time changes in the correct rates for 22 individual rats (gray) were aligned to ...
(a) Mean population activity trajectories (bolded color lines) diverge by trial difficulty. Single t...
<p>Two animals fully trained in the categorization task learned two hitherto unknown categories (<i>...
Estimation of learning curves is ubiquitously based on proportions of correct responses within movin...
<p>Table shows source of dog, breed, sex, sessions to learning the discrimination task, percentage o...
<p><b>A</b>) The outline of the training schedule for the recognition of moving bars. <b>B</b>) Repr...