The paper examines the history of the Queensland's parliament's constituent power as well as its present scope. It maps the evolution of the Queensland Constitution from its inception as an 'uncontrolled' constitution to the transformations effected by the colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 (CLVA), the Commonwealth Constitution and the Australia Acts 1986. The manner and form limitations in the CLVA ore examined followed by a discussion of the limits on state legislative power and the integration of Queensland courts into the federal judicial structure under the Commonwealth Constitution. The paper then focuses on the profound constitutional changes wrought by the Australia Acts 1986. It examines the implications of the House of Lords decision...
The thesis explores the legal personality of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Constitution of...
This paper considers the extent to which the common law or the Constitution restrict the ability of ...
In Kirk the High Court unanimously held that, based on s 73 of the Australian Constitution, the capa...
This article examines the reasoning in Spence v Queensland (Spence), in which a majority of the High...
In drafting the Constitution, the Framers were conscious about the need to maintain the division of ...
This thesis examines the relationship between the rule of law and the Australian Constitution. Its m...
What are the possible bases for the authority of the Australian Constitution? Why should people and ...
This commentary explains the Privy Council’s opinion in Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286, a cas...
© 2014 Dr. Elizabeth Eve Judith SouthwoodThe meaning of the "judicial power of the Commonwealth" und...
Discussion of the prospects of formal constitutional change as a mechanism for reforming Australian ...
The Australian High Court has stated that the federal Parliament may not abdicate its legislative po...
The framers of the Australian Constitution entrenched the principle of separation of powers—specific...
tag=1 data=The Parliament of the states and territories in an Australian republic. by Geoffrey Linde...
The legal basis of the Australian Constitution and, more specifically, how 'autochthony' for the Con...
This thesis examines the possibilities for building a reconciliatory jurisprudence for the protectio...
The thesis explores the legal personality of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Constitution of...
This paper considers the extent to which the common law or the Constitution restrict the ability of ...
In Kirk the High Court unanimously held that, based on s 73 of the Australian Constitution, the capa...
This article examines the reasoning in Spence v Queensland (Spence), in which a majority of the High...
In drafting the Constitution, the Framers were conscious about the need to maintain the division of ...
This thesis examines the relationship between the rule of law and the Australian Constitution. Its m...
What are the possible bases for the authority of the Australian Constitution? Why should people and ...
This commentary explains the Privy Council’s opinion in Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286, a cas...
© 2014 Dr. Elizabeth Eve Judith SouthwoodThe meaning of the "judicial power of the Commonwealth" und...
Discussion of the prospects of formal constitutional change as a mechanism for reforming Australian ...
The Australian High Court has stated that the federal Parliament may not abdicate its legislative po...
The framers of the Australian Constitution entrenched the principle of separation of powers—specific...
tag=1 data=The Parliament of the states and territories in an Australian republic. by Geoffrey Linde...
The legal basis of the Australian Constitution and, more specifically, how 'autochthony' for the Con...
This thesis examines the possibilities for building a reconciliatory jurisprudence for the protectio...
The thesis explores the legal personality of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Constitution of...
This paper considers the extent to which the common law or the Constitution restrict the ability of ...
In Kirk the High Court unanimously held that, based on s 73 of the Australian Constitution, the capa...