<p>The top panel shows the global results for all papers relevant to the respective question (either all 59 papers or the 55 papers satisfying Condition 3), while the bottom panel shows the results stratified by research field (bioinformatics: BI, computational statistics: CS and machine learning: ML). (A) and (E): Does the paper include a comparison of two or more methods?; (B) and (F): Does the paper include an evaluation on real data?; (C) and (G): Does the paper fulfill Condition 3?; (D) and (H): Does the paper present a new method?</p
This dataset contains supplementary material to a review paper on bioblitzes (submitted). This datas...
Innovation and technology are considered as a subject of success and achievement to the firm. The co...
<p>Top: Results of several metrics with all paradigms averaged, for the different number of trials u...
<p>The top panel shows the global results for all papers relevant to the respective question (either...
<p>The top panel depicts the results for all papers, the results in the middle panel are stratified...
<p>The top panel shows the composite selections of our respondents for the question asking which pap...
To select the best paper at a conference or in a journal, people use reasonably standard semi-heuris...
Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship applications submitted to two...
<p>Each graph shows respondent selection for most cited (left axis, blue) and actual citations as of...
In computational science literature including, e.g., bioinformatics, computational statistics or mac...
This data set corresponds to the paper: Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common...
An overview of the result of the best-proposed algorithm and the best from the literature.</p
<p>Probability density function of the proportion of papers belonging to a particular subject-catego...
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
Peer evaluation is the cornerstone of science evaluation. In this paper, we analyze whether or not a...
This dataset contains supplementary material to a review paper on bioblitzes (submitted). This datas...
Innovation and technology are considered as a subject of success and achievement to the firm. The co...
<p>Top: Results of several metrics with all paradigms averaged, for the different number of trials u...
<p>The top panel shows the global results for all papers relevant to the respective question (either...
<p>The top panel depicts the results for all papers, the results in the middle panel are stratified...
<p>The top panel shows the composite selections of our respondents for the question asking which pap...
To select the best paper at a conference or in a journal, people use reasonably standard semi-heuris...
Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship applications submitted to two...
<p>Each graph shows respondent selection for most cited (left axis, blue) and actual citations as of...
In computational science literature including, e.g., bioinformatics, computational statistics or mac...
This data set corresponds to the paper: Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common...
An overview of the result of the best-proposed algorithm and the best from the literature.</p
<p>Probability density function of the proportion of papers belonging to a particular subject-catego...
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
Peer evaluation is the cornerstone of science evaluation. In this paper, we analyze whether or not a...
This dataset contains supplementary material to a review paper on bioblitzes (submitted). This datas...
Innovation and technology are considered as a subject of success and achievement to the firm. The co...
<p>Top: Results of several metrics with all paradigms averaged, for the different number of trials u...