<p>Agreement between user and DETECT labeling is measured in total seconds of the data for dataset D1. The percentages denote the percent of the data that was in each of the five comparison categories. The Total Agreement column is the sum of the Agreement and Null Agreement columns. A certainty threshold value of 0.5 was used with the thresholdPolicy post-processing function.</p
<p>A. Classification model fot target detection built from the Color Luminance experiment and used t...
<p>The results of the agreement between the paired scales and the numbers of participants whose diff...
<p>Pairwise comparison of agreement among laboratory methods using crude agreement percentages and k...
<p>Agreement between user and DETECT labeling is measured in total seconds of the data for dataset D...
<p>Agreement between user and DETECT labeling is measured in total seconds of the data for dataset D...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>Bland—Altman plots to evaluate agreement between cycle threshold values generated for the NP targ...
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
<p>This contains the agreement between the original and predicted labels of samples in the discovery...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
The ability to agree with the TREC Blog06 opinion assessments was measured for seven human assessors...
<p>A. Classification model fot target detection built from the Color Luminance experiment and used t...
<p>The results of the agreement between the paired scales and the numbers of participants whose diff...
<p>Pairwise comparison of agreement among laboratory methods using crude agreement percentages and k...
<p>Agreement between user and DETECT labeling is measured in total seconds of the data for dataset D...
<p>Agreement between user and DETECT labeling is measured in total seconds of the data for dataset D...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>The boundaries of the boxes indicate the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, the lin...
<p>Bland—Altman plots to evaluate agreement between cycle threshold values generated for the NP targ...
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
<p>This contains the agreement between the original and predicted labels of samples in the discovery...
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
The ability to agree with the TREC Blog06 opinion assessments was measured for seven human assessors...
<p>A. Classification model fot target detection built from the Color Luminance experiment and used t...
<p>The results of the agreement between the paired scales and the numbers of participants whose diff...
<p>Pairwise comparison of agreement among laboratory methods using crude agreement percentages and k...