<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0062282#pone.0062282-Hogan1" target="_blank">[1]</a>. Price based on cost provided by Blue Fuzion based in Hong Kong.</p><p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0062282#pone.0062282-United1" target="_blank">[2]</a>. Health effect indicates risk of event compared with the base case, i.e., effect = 0.80 means 20% lower risk of mortality or morbidity for the "NASG for severe shock" scenario than assumed in the main analysis.</p
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
Each parameter plus/minus 50% PHI–Prostate Health Index, A&E–accident and emergency department, HK$—...
<p>1. Proportion of cohort with severe shock (MAP<60) is 18% for Egypt<sup>16</sup> and 72%<sup>15</...
<p>The sensitivity analysis recalculates the net expected cost of each strategy (Scr vs. uNGAL+Scr),...
<p>Note: A risk assessment and treatment strategy is said to dominate if it is less costly and more ...
<p>All costs in US dollars. Incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds obtained in one-way sensitivit...
<p>P, probability; y, year; mo, month; US$, US dollar. Blue bars represent the change in ICER when a...
<p>Sensitivity Analyses exploring influence of cost outliers and individual trials, NHS and Societal...
<p>For each of the varied input values, results correspond to the ranges shown in <a href="http://ww...
<p>Each input parameter was varied over its range (shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/...
<p>Sensitivity analysis of two intervention comparison (NE versus EVD alone; NE + EVD versus EVD + I...
<p>The analysis uses 1,000 non-homogeneous Markov-Chain Monte Carlo simulations of 1,000 patients fo...
<p>Mean cost and effect differences (95% CI) between the intervention and control group in the main ...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
Each parameter plus/minus 50% PHI–Prostate Health Index, A&E–accident and emergency department, HK$—...
<p>1. Proportion of cohort with severe shock (MAP<60) is 18% for Egypt<sup>16</sup> and 72%<sup>15</...
<p>The sensitivity analysis recalculates the net expected cost of each strategy (Scr vs. uNGAL+Scr),...
<p>Note: A risk assessment and treatment strategy is said to dominate if it is less costly and more ...
<p>All costs in US dollars. Incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds obtained in one-way sensitivit...
<p>P, probability; y, year; mo, month; US$, US dollar. Blue bars represent the change in ICER when a...
<p>Sensitivity Analyses exploring influence of cost outliers and individual trials, NHS and Societal...
<p>For each of the varied input values, results correspond to the ranges shown in <a href="http://ww...
<p>Each input parameter was varied over its range (shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/...
<p>Sensitivity analysis of two intervention comparison (NE versus EVD alone; NE + EVD versus EVD + I...
<p>The analysis uses 1,000 non-homogeneous Markov-Chain Monte Carlo simulations of 1,000 patients fo...
<p>Mean cost and effect differences (95% CI) between the intervention and control group in the main ...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
This study elicits individual preferences for reducing morbidity and mortality risk in the context o...
Each parameter plus/minus 50% PHI–Prostate Health Index, A&E–accident and emergency department, HK$—...