No difference in inflammation induced corneal angiogenesis between <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> and WT mice.

<p>(A) Photographic images of WT and <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> eyes. (B) H&E staining of frozen sections prepared from <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> and WT eyes 12 days post suture. (C&E) Confocal images. Nuclear staining using Draq5 is shown in blue. (C) Corneal inflammation demonstrated by Ly-6B.2 staining. (D) Quantification of Ly-6B.2 staining shows no difference in inflammation between <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> and WT mice. (E) Angiogenesis depicted by PECAM-1 staining in <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> and WT mice. (F) Quantification of PECAM-1 staining from E. The number of <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> and WT mice used: 0 hours (n = 3); Day 3 (n = 3); Day 7 (n = 5); Day 12 (n = 6). There was no significant difference observed in inflammation or angiogenesis between the <i>Jam-A^gt/gt</i> and WT mice. Scale bar 100 µm. CE: Corneal epithelium; CS: Corneal stroma; I: Iris.