<p>Percentage of erroneously selected letters (relative to all trials with an incorrect T2 response) presented 1–3 serial positions following T2 as a function of lag, for small, medium, and large blinkers.</p
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on er...
Item does not contain fulltextWe typically slow down after committing an error, an effect termed pos...
<p>Percentage of erroneously selected letters (relative to all trials with an incorrect T2 response)...
<p>The percentage of letters at a particular position in the RSVP stream that were reported as T2 gi...
<p>(a) Recognition accuracy, with dotted line denoting chance performance. (b) Intrusions as a perce...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 and T2 given correct report of T1 as a function of lag, for ...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (black symbols) and T2 given correct report of T1 (white sym...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
<p>Panel (a) Percentage correctly identified letters in the dual-task condition. T1-identification i...
<p>Panel (a) Percentage correctly identified letters in the dual-task condition of Experiment 3a. T1...
<p>The observed priming effects (i.e., difference in RTs between the unrelated and related trials; i...
Loach and Marí-Beffa (Vis Cogn, 10:513–526, 2003) observed that a distractor stimulus, presented imm...
<p>Median ± interquartile ranges (n = 10) of (A) no. of accentuated clicks and (B) duration of click...
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on er...
Item does not contain fulltextWe typically slow down after committing an error, an effect termed pos...
<p>Percentage of erroneously selected letters (relative to all trials with an incorrect T2 response)...
<p>The percentage of letters at a particular position in the RSVP stream that were reported as T2 gi...
<p>(a) Recognition accuracy, with dotted line denoting chance performance. (b) Intrusions as a perce...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 and T2 given correct report of T1 as a function of lag, for ...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (black symbols) and T2 given correct report of T1 (white sym...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
<p>Panel (a) Percentage correctly identified letters in the dual-task condition. T1-identification i...
<p>Panel (a) Percentage correctly identified letters in the dual-task condition of Experiment 3a. T1...
<p>The observed priming effects (i.e., difference in RTs between the unrelated and related trials; i...
Loach and Marí-Beffa (Vis Cogn, 10:513–526, 2003) observed that a distractor stimulus, presented imm...
<p>Median ± interquartile ranges (n = 10) of (A) no. of accentuated clicks and (B) duration of click...
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on er...
Item does not contain fulltextWe typically slow down after committing an error, an effect termed pos...
DOI
Add to ORKG