<p>Mean reaction times (± SEM) for all subjects, in the absence of TMS, for each type of cues (BL: baseline, INIT: initiation, INTER: intermediate, TERM: termination). The code of colour is the same as that used for the cue in the experiments. A. In the simple task (Experiment #1), RT were significantly larger for the INIT cues than for the INTER and TERM cues. B. In the superordinate task (Experiment #2), RT were significantly longer for the INIT and TERM cues than for the BL and INTER cues.</p
<p>Experiment 2: Mean Reaction Time (in ms) and percentage errors (in Parentheses) as a function of ...
In this study the influence of irrelevant stimulus changes from one trial to another in a se-rial re...
<p>Reaction time for directional and non-directional cue conditions under active vs. sham stimulatio...
<p>Mean RT (+ SE, in ms) was compared for each cueing condition (congruent, incongruent, control) fo...
<p>Reaction time data for each stimulus discriminability, orientation, and session (reward, stimulus...
NoPURPOSE. This study examined the influence of stimulus chromaticity on simple reaction times (RTs)...
<p>Mean Reaction Time (in ms) as a function of display type, cueing, SOA, and spatial Stroop in Expe...
<p>Mean Reaction Time (in ms) as a function of display type, cueing, SOA, and spatial Stroop in Expe...
<p>Reaction time for directional and non-directional cue conditions under active vs. sham stimulatio...
<p>Data are shown for Experiment 1 (a), Experiment 2 (b), Experiment 3 (c) and Experiment 4 (d).</p
<p><i>RT*</i> was longer for the shape than color task, incongruent than congruent stimuli, and West...
<p>Note that the RT reflects the time to respond to the visual target from the presentation of first...
Ansorge U, Horstmann G. Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-...
<p>Mean reaction times (RTs, in milliseconds) and error percentages for congruent (solid line) and i...
Reaction times of participants per group per stimulus type per presentation time and cue validity ef...
<p>Experiment 2: Mean Reaction Time (in ms) and percentage errors (in Parentheses) as a function of ...
In this study the influence of irrelevant stimulus changes from one trial to another in a se-rial re...
<p>Reaction time for directional and non-directional cue conditions under active vs. sham stimulatio...
<p>Mean RT (+ SE, in ms) was compared for each cueing condition (congruent, incongruent, control) fo...
<p>Reaction time data for each stimulus discriminability, orientation, and session (reward, stimulus...
NoPURPOSE. This study examined the influence of stimulus chromaticity on simple reaction times (RTs)...
<p>Mean Reaction Time (in ms) as a function of display type, cueing, SOA, and spatial Stroop in Expe...
<p>Mean Reaction Time (in ms) as a function of display type, cueing, SOA, and spatial Stroop in Expe...
<p>Reaction time for directional and non-directional cue conditions under active vs. sham stimulatio...
<p>Data are shown for Experiment 1 (a), Experiment 2 (b), Experiment 3 (c) and Experiment 4 (d).</p
<p><i>RT*</i> was longer for the shape than color task, incongruent than congruent stimuli, and West...
<p>Note that the RT reflects the time to respond to the visual target from the presentation of first...
Ansorge U, Horstmann G. Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-...
<p>Mean reaction times (RTs, in milliseconds) and error percentages for congruent (solid line) and i...
Reaction times of participants per group per stimulus type per presentation time and cue validity ef...
<p>Experiment 2: Mean Reaction Time (in ms) and percentage errors (in Parentheses) as a function of ...
In this study the influence of irrelevant stimulus changes from one trial to another in a se-rial re...
<p>Reaction time for directional and non-directional cue conditions under active vs. sham stimulatio...