<p>The relationship between logarithmic larval abundance and time for four different pH treatments. Lines were plotted using coefficients from the GLMM. The first two sampling points were on days 3 and 6, after which the larval sampling was conducted every other day. Each replicate (n = 20) for each sampling point is shown.</p
<p>Results from Model 10 ( = east * north * doy + s(year)comp). The probability of observing larva...
<p>Both Shade and Population were significant predictors of mean larval duration under all treatment...
<p>Summary statistics quantifying model skill in matching published larval fish growth rates.</p
<p>Effects of pH treatment and time on larval abundance.</p><p>All two-way interactions between time...
<p>Larval sizes are illustrated as size frequency distributions in pH treatments (A) 7.2, (B) 7.4, (...
<p>Relationship between the difference in proportion survival between the LA treatment and LP treatm...
<p>Different letters represent statistically significant difference among means with P<0.05 level (G...
<p>Logistic regression: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.656, guarding duration coefficients = 0.951, constant coef...
<p>(A) Mean competitive index and (B) mean food intake for each regime (bars indicate ± one standard...
<p>The relationship between the initial abundance and growth rates of microzooplankton species in bo...
<p>Numbers represent the cumulative daily proportion of Rock and Rock-kdr pupae formation after larv...
<p>Samples color coded into four groupings calculated by 25% of the maximum relative abundance for e...
<p>Abundances are plotted on a log-scale. The population consists of larvae, pupae and adults, where...
<p>a.Not calculated.</p><p>b.Larval densities increased over previous (pre-) application.</p><p>Aver...
<p>For <i>X</i> -linked MBGs, a measure of dosage compensation () is plotted against and transcript ...
<p>Results from Model 10 ( = east * north * doy + s(year)comp). The probability of observing larva...
<p>Both Shade and Population were significant predictors of mean larval duration under all treatment...
<p>Summary statistics quantifying model skill in matching published larval fish growth rates.</p
<p>Effects of pH treatment and time on larval abundance.</p><p>All two-way interactions between time...
<p>Larval sizes are illustrated as size frequency distributions in pH treatments (A) 7.2, (B) 7.4, (...
<p>Relationship between the difference in proportion survival between the LA treatment and LP treatm...
<p>Different letters represent statistically significant difference among means with P<0.05 level (G...
<p>Logistic regression: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.656, guarding duration coefficients = 0.951, constant coef...
<p>(A) Mean competitive index and (B) mean food intake for each regime (bars indicate ± one standard...
<p>The relationship between the initial abundance and growth rates of microzooplankton species in bo...
<p>Numbers represent the cumulative daily proportion of Rock and Rock-kdr pupae formation after larv...
<p>Samples color coded into four groupings calculated by 25% of the maximum relative abundance for e...
<p>Abundances are plotted on a log-scale. The population consists of larvae, pupae and adults, where...
<p>a.Not calculated.</p><p>b.Larval densities increased over previous (pre-) application.</p><p>Aver...
<p>For <i>X</i> -linked MBGs, a measure of dosage compensation () is plotted against and transcript ...
<p>Results from Model 10 ( = east * north * doy + s(year)comp). The probability of observing larva...
<p>Both Shade and Population were significant predictors of mean larval duration under all treatment...
<p>Summary statistics quantifying model skill in matching published larval fish growth rates.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG