<p>The top panel (of each figure) shows the relative abundance of each OTU averaged for the six samples processed with the same extraction method. Individual OTUs are ranked on the x-axis according to their average relative abundance in all (12) samples from high (left) to low (right). E, enzymatic lysis; M, mechanical lysis. Bottom panel indicates the number of samples (0–6) in which the corresponding OTU was found (prevalence). Green bars, enzymatic lysis; blue bars, mechanical lysis.</p
<p>(A) The number of reads assigned to each OTU (x-axis) across all the samples (y-axis) is represen...
<p>Relative abundance was calculated by normalizing number of core OTU sequences to the total number...
This file contains the distribution of observed OTUs across all the studied samples. A total of 785 ...
<p>The OTU rank is defined by the total number of sequences across all samples, with the most abunda...
<p>For each OTU, the relative abundance is plotted for each sample in which the OTU is present. The ...
<p>For each OTU, abundance across sites is normalized to give a mean of zero and a standard deviatio...
<p>The relative abundances of each OTU were normalized to a mean of 0 with standard deviation of 1 (...
This table list percentage relative abundance for each OTU retained after the sequence quality filte...
a<p>Data is from closed-reference picked OTUs, rarefied at 1404 sequences per sample.</p>b<p>Values ...
<p>(A) Numbers of OTUs counted present in the preserved and maintained aeration-basin samples and th...
<p>Differentially abundant OTUs having a median abundance > 0.1% in at least one group of samples ha...
<p>OTUs are ordered by consensus taxonomic classification, with OTUs scaled by relative abundances f...
<p>The numbers of the predominant OTUs whose relative abundance were higher than 1.0% were presented...
<p>Sequences are ordered by rank abundance on the x-axes. Note that the scale varies for each graph ...
<p>Heat map of selected OTUs at 98% similarity by subject A) one week before and B) within 72 hours ...
<p>(A) The number of reads assigned to each OTU (x-axis) across all the samples (y-axis) is represen...
<p>Relative abundance was calculated by normalizing number of core OTU sequences to the total number...
This file contains the distribution of observed OTUs across all the studied samples. A total of 785 ...
<p>The OTU rank is defined by the total number of sequences across all samples, with the most abunda...
<p>For each OTU, the relative abundance is plotted for each sample in which the OTU is present. The ...
<p>For each OTU, abundance across sites is normalized to give a mean of zero and a standard deviatio...
<p>The relative abundances of each OTU were normalized to a mean of 0 with standard deviation of 1 (...
This table list percentage relative abundance for each OTU retained after the sequence quality filte...
a<p>Data is from closed-reference picked OTUs, rarefied at 1404 sequences per sample.</p>b<p>Values ...
<p>(A) Numbers of OTUs counted present in the preserved and maintained aeration-basin samples and th...
<p>Differentially abundant OTUs having a median abundance > 0.1% in at least one group of samples ha...
<p>OTUs are ordered by consensus taxonomic classification, with OTUs scaled by relative abundances f...
<p>The numbers of the predominant OTUs whose relative abundance were higher than 1.0% were presented...
<p>Sequences are ordered by rank abundance on the x-axes. Note that the scale varies for each graph ...
<p>Heat map of selected OTUs at 98% similarity by subject A) one week before and B) within 72 hours ...
<p>(A) The number of reads assigned to each OTU (x-axis) across all the samples (y-axis) is represen...
<p>Relative abundance was calculated by normalizing number of core OTU sequences to the total number...
This file contains the distribution of observed OTUs across all the studied samples. A total of 785 ...