<p>Patient C (top panel) showed remarkable increase of VAS and EMG amplitude due to MVF while Patient G (bottom panel) did not show obvious changes in both VAS and EMG activities.</p
<p>V-waves are circled on the figures. Note the reductions in V-wave amplitude following the 80% pro...
<p>Results obtained for different electrophysiological parameters in cells of the mNG.</p
INTRODUCTION: To compare the power spectral changes of the voluntary surface electromyogram (sEMG) a...
<p>Each symbol indicates an individual subject data. The error bars indicate the standard deviation ...
<p>IN panel A, VAF between the original perturbed EMG signal and reconstructed perturbed EMG generat...
<p>Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 7). Asterisks indicate significant differenc...
<p>MFM<sub>total</sub>: mean pixel intensity, MRCS: MRC sumscore, MFM: motor function measurement. T...
<p>A: Gain of weighted EMG (all seven muscles from both ankle and hip) from visual scene angle. B: P...
<p>Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 15). Asterisks indicate significant differen...
<p>Panel A: Continuous EMG pattern recorded from participant A53 during standing at lower (5 Hz) and...
<p>A: Gain of weighted EMG (all seven muscles from both ankle and hip) from platform angle. B: Phase...
<p>The MMG-MEPs responses from FCR muscle during FCR voluntary contraction without median nerve stim...
<p>Representative dark-adapted ERG components (a-wave, b-wave and OPs) and PhNR were recorded in con...
<p>Asterisks indicate significant differences from baseline EMG responses. *: <i>p</i> < 0.05. Aster...
<p>Mean EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>mean</sub>), peak EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>peak</sub>) and rate...
<p>V-waves are circled on the figures. Note the reductions in V-wave amplitude following the 80% pro...
<p>Results obtained for different electrophysiological parameters in cells of the mNG.</p
INTRODUCTION: To compare the power spectral changes of the voluntary surface electromyogram (sEMG) a...
<p>Each symbol indicates an individual subject data. The error bars indicate the standard deviation ...
<p>IN panel A, VAF between the original perturbed EMG signal and reconstructed perturbed EMG generat...
<p>Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 7). Asterisks indicate significant differenc...
<p>MFM<sub>total</sub>: mean pixel intensity, MRCS: MRC sumscore, MFM: motor function measurement. T...
<p>A: Gain of weighted EMG (all seven muscles from both ankle and hip) from visual scene angle. B: P...
<p>Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 15). Asterisks indicate significant differen...
<p>Panel A: Continuous EMG pattern recorded from participant A53 during standing at lower (5 Hz) and...
<p>A: Gain of weighted EMG (all seven muscles from both ankle and hip) from platform angle. B: Phase...
<p>The MMG-MEPs responses from FCR muscle during FCR voluntary contraction without median nerve stim...
<p>Representative dark-adapted ERG components (a-wave, b-wave and OPs) and PhNR were recorded in con...
<p>Asterisks indicate significant differences from baseline EMG responses. *: <i>p</i> < 0.05. Aster...
<p>Mean EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>mean</sub>), peak EMG<sub>rms</sub> (EMG<sub>peak</sub>) and rate...
<p>V-waves are circled on the figures. Note the reductions in V-wave amplitude following the 80% pro...
<p>Results obtained for different electrophysiological parameters in cells of the mNG.</p
INTRODUCTION: To compare the power spectral changes of the voluntary surface electromyogram (sEMG) a...
DOI
Add to ORKG