<p>Poster presentation from Medical Library Group of Southern California & Arizona (MLGSCA) and the Northern California and Nevada Medical Library Group (NCNMLG) Joint Meeting in July 2013</p> <p> </p> <p>Succinctly describes the key differences between literature reviews and systematic reviews. Emphasis on how systematic reviews support evidence-based practice. This information can benefit information professionals and biomedical researchers. </p
peer-reviewedIt takes time to recognise the differences between a literature search (LS), a literat...
Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Literature reviews are central to any academic research. Whether journal article, conference present...
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, criti...
<b>Objective:</b> To understand how systematic and narrative reviews differ in terms of research obj...
A literature review is a key part of all academic research that informs researchers of the existing ...
Review of existing research findings from the literature is essential to inform evidence-based pract...
Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Poster accepted for the MLGSCA/NCNMLG Joint Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ, January 21-24, 2018.Background:...
The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.comThis paper examines the subject of s...
Review articles can provide valuable summaries of the ever-increasing volume of primary research in ...
Systematic reviews are considered as the highest rung in the ladder of evidence-based medicine. They...
Poster accepted for the Science & Technology Section Research Poster Session, American Library Assoc...
peer-reviewedIt takes time to recognise the differences between a literature search (LS), a literat...
Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Literature reviews are central to any academic research. Whether journal article, conference present...
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, criti...
<b>Objective:</b> To understand how systematic and narrative reviews differ in terms of research obj...
A literature review is a key part of all academic research that informs researchers of the existing ...
Review of existing research findings from the literature is essential to inform evidence-based pract...
Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Poster accepted for the MLGSCA/NCNMLG Joint Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ, January 21-24, 2018.Background:...
The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.comThis paper examines the subject of s...
Review articles can provide valuable summaries of the ever-increasing volume of primary research in ...
Systematic reviews are considered as the highest rung in the ladder of evidence-based medicine. They...
Poster accepted for the Science & Technology Section Research Poster Session, American Library Assoc...
peer-reviewedIt takes time to recognise the differences between a literature search (LS), a literat...
Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
DOI
Add to ORKG