<p>Statistical differences were observed in both the force ratio and FP<sub>peak</sub> between CTS and control groups. (Statistical analysis method: mixed effect model; the level of significance was set at <i>p</i>≤0.05).</p
<p>A) Force profile (average of 50 trials) of the baseline (dashed lines) and final (solid lines) se...
<p>There were significant differences in mean flexural strength among the groups (p<0.001). Groups d...
<p>Statistical analyses on the groups (contingent positive (CP), negative (CN) and sham) differences...
<p>There were statistical differences in the results of functional sensibility between each pair of ...
<p>Statistical comparison between the two groups. Significance level at p = 0.01. In brackets the st...
The mean force at moderate pain (Level 5) in Experiment 2. (A) The mean force as a function of task ...
<p>Histograms show the effects of the main independent factors (incentive and arousal levels) on the...
<p>Regional Cth (mean ± standard deviation, in mm, the values are adjusted for age), results (p-valu...
<p>Each data point represents group means ± SE. * Indicates a significant (p≤0.015) difference betwe...
<p>Correlation between peak values of F<sub>med</sub> (A) or medial force ratios (B) and EAM at earl...
<p>Differences in reaction times between the ‘hands behind the back’ and ‘hands on lap’ postural con...
<p>The bars represent the mean and the error bars, the standard deviation. Dark grey bar = fibromyal...
<p>Differences in reaction times between the ‘Incongruent’ and ‘Congruent’ postural conditions (A) a...
<p>Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Bold text indicates the clinical parameters that have sho...
<p>The difference in all of the traditional sensibility tests between each pair of the CTS subgroups...
<p>A) Force profile (average of 50 trials) of the baseline (dashed lines) and final (solid lines) se...
<p>There were significant differences in mean flexural strength among the groups (p<0.001). Groups d...
<p>Statistical analyses on the groups (contingent positive (CP), negative (CN) and sham) differences...
<p>There were statistical differences in the results of functional sensibility between each pair of ...
<p>Statistical comparison between the two groups. Significance level at p = 0.01. In brackets the st...
The mean force at moderate pain (Level 5) in Experiment 2. (A) The mean force as a function of task ...
<p>Histograms show the effects of the main independent factors (incentive and arousal levels) on the...
<p>Regional Cth (mean ± standard deviation, in mm, the values are adjusted for age), results (p-valu...
<p>Each data point represents group means ± SE. * Indicates a significant (p≤0.015) difference betwe...
<p>Correlation between peak values of F<sub>med</sub> (A) or medial force ratios (B) and EAM at earl...
<p>Differences in reaction times between the ‘hands behind the back’ and ‘hands on lap’ postural con...
<p>The bars represent the mean and the error bars, the standard deviation. Dark grey bar = fibromyal...
<p>Differences in reaction times between the ‘Incongruent’ and ‘Congruent’ postural conditions (A) a...
<p>Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Bold text indicates the clinical parameters that have sho...
<p>The difference in all of the traditional sensibility tests between each pair of the CTS subgroups...
<p>A) Force profile (average of 50 trials) of the baseline (dashed lines) and final (solid lines) se...
<p>There were significant differences in mean flexural strength among the groups (p<0.001). Groups d...
<p>Statistical analyses on the groups (contingent positive (CP), negative (CN) and sham) differences...