Four Mechanisms in the Reactions of 3‑Aminopyrrole with 1,3,5-Triazines: Inverse Electron Demand Diels–Alder Cycloadditions vs S_NAr Reactions via Uncatalyzed and Acid-Catalyzed Pathways

Reaction of 3-aminopyrrole with seven 1,3,5-triazines was studied in a one-step reaction (in situ formation of 3-aminopyrrole) and a two-step reaction (using the tetraphenylborate salt and an amine base). An inverse-electron demand Diels–Alder reaction (IEDDA) was observed with R₁ = CF₃, CO₂Et, and H with the formation of 5<i>H</i>-pyrrolo­[3,2-<i>d</i>]­pyrimidine derivatives. S_NAr was observed when 2,4,6-trifluoro- or 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine were used1,3,5-triazines that had leaving groups. If excess 1,3,5-triazine was present the initial S_NAr product reacted further, in the presence of acid and water, with another equivalent of 1,3,5-triazine to give compounds containing three linked heterocyclic rings. No reaction was observed with R₁ = C₆H₅ and OCH₃. Four mechanisms are proposed to explain the experimental results: uncatalyzed and acid catalyzed inverse electron demand Diels–Alder cascades leading to cycloaddition, and uncatalyzed and acid-catalyzed S_NAr reactions leading, respectively, to single and double substitution products. Acid catalysis was a factor when there was reduced reactivity in either reactant