<p><strong>Figure 12.</strong> (a) No scenarios present a system-wide CCUS network that has a positive net present value. (b) When considering only the EOR operations, the oil production is profitable in three cases, none of which assume a CO<sub>2</sub> emission penalty applies to emissions from oil combustion.</p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>This letter compares several bounding cases for understanding the economic viability of capturing large quantities of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> from coal-fired power generators within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas electric grid and using it for pure CO<sub>2</sub> enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in the onshore coastal region of Texas along the Gulf of Mexico. All captured CO<sub>2...
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Capital and operating expenditures for each of the ten CO<sub>...
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> The average annual marginal generation cost approximates the wholesale...
<p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> The pipeline network for the <em>slow oil production scenarios</em> co...
<p><strong>Figure 11.</strong> Both scenarios 3 and 4 have very similar total CO<sub>2</sub> emissio...
<p><strong>Figure 6.</strong> (a) The oil production for each scenario. (b) The quantity of CO<sub>2...
<p><strong>Figure 8.</strong> (a) The EOR oil production follows the delivered quantity of CO<sub>2<...
<p><strong>Figure 5.</strong> The operating profits (all revenues from CO<sub>2</sub> and electricit...
<p><strong>Figure 10.</strong> For the 'fast' scenarios 3 and 4, there is a much larger quantity of ...
<p><b>Table 4.</b> Summary of system-wide economics of CCUS network ($2009 mil...
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Description of four scenarios run to bound the cash flow analy...
<p><b>Table 6.</b> Cash flow results for the pipeline capital and operation. V...
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Economic parameters and summarized costs for calculating net p...
<p><strong>Figure 9.</strong> In the 'fast' scenarios 3 and 4, the net amount of CO<sub>2</sub>/yr i...
<p><strong>Figure 7.</strong> For 'slow' scenarios 1 and 2, the net amount of CO<sub>2</sub> injecte...
<p><strong>Figure 4.</strong> The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the ERCOT coal fleet (a) and total E...
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Capital and operating expenditures for each of the ten CO<sub>...
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> The average annual marginal generation cost approximates the wholesale...
<p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> The pipeline network for the <em>slow oil production scenarios</em> co...
<p><strong>Figure 11.</strong> Both scenarios 3 and 4 have very similar total CO<sub>2</sub> emissio...
<p><strong>Figure 6.</strong> (a) The oil production for each scenario. (b) The quantity of CO<sub>2...
<p><strong>Figure 8.</strong> (a) The EOR oil production follows the delivered quantity of CO<sub>2<...
<p><strong>Figure 5.</strong> The operating profits (all revenues from CO<sub>2</sub> and electricit...
<p><strong>Figure 10.</strong> For the 'fast' scenarios 3 and 4, there is a much larger quantity of ...
<p><b>Table 4.</b> Summary of system-wide economics of CCUS network ($2009 mil...
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Description of four scenarios run to bound the cash flow analy...
<p><b>Table 6.</b> Cash flow results for the pipeline capital and operation. V...
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Economic parameters and summarized costs for calculating net p...
<p><strong>Figure 9.</strong> In the 'fast' scenarios 3 and 4, the net amount of CO<sub>2</sub>/yr i...
<p><strong>Figure 7.</strong> For 'slow' scenarios 1 and 2, the net amount of CO<sub>2</sub> injecte...
<p><strong>Figure 4.</strong> The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the ERCOT coal fleet (a) and total E...
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Capital and operating expenditures for each of the ten CO<sub>...
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> The average annual marginal generation cost approximates the wholesale...
<p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> The pipeline network for the <em>slow oil production scenarios</em> co...