<p>Symbols indicate the mean percent canopy cover (± SE) of breeding sites used by each species according to their preferred breeding habitat (rainforest, impacted or both rainforest and impacted). Species in the top panel used the rubber plantation as non-breeding habitat, and species in the bottom panel did not. Species codes next to each symbol are the same as in Figure 1.</p
<p>Top left: LE—broad tolerance, optimum climate 5. Top right: HE—broad tolerance, optimum 2. Bottom...
<p>Species scores on the first compositional axis were used as an indicator of species association w...
<p>The box plot shows median, quartiles, 5- and 95-percentiles and extreme values. NB: Only two Aust...
<p>These were from open to closed habitats (left) and wet to dry habitats (right). Mean habitat asso...
<p>Thick, center lines connect the value of remaining range to the value of metapopulation capacity ...
<p>Boxplot showing species richness for each sampled habitat where mongoose were absent (shaded bars...
<p>Non-indigenous invertebrate a) percent cover and b) species richness, native invertebrate c) perc...
<p>White bars represent species with high extinction risk, light gray represent species with low ext...
<p>The symbols indicate the posterior means and the bars indicate the 95% posterior intervals. The s...
<p>Proportion of potential habitat and diversity of arboreal marsupial groups (±1 SE) in urban, urba...
This is a standard phytocoenological table with trait data for each species. Species are in rows and...
<p>Lines within each panel show different selection criteria and removal rules, and the grey shaded ...
<p>Non-significant pairwise differences between land-use types are indicated by the presence of the ...
<p>Habitat suitability map indicating the number of arboreal marsupials groups across the urbanizati...
<p>Panels show how the metric of conservation value changes in primary forest (a & b), secondary for...
<p>Top left: LE—broad tolerance, optimum climate 5. Top right: HE—broad tolerance, optimum 2. Bottom...
<p>Species scores on the first compositional axis were used as an indicator of species association w...
<p>The box plot shows median, quartiles, 5- and 95-percentiles and extreme values. NB: Only two Aust...
<p>These were from open to closed habitats (left) and wet to dry habitats (right). Mean habitat asso...
<p>Thick, center lines connect the value of remaining range to the value of metapopulation capacity ...
<p>Boxplot showing species richness for each sampled habitat where mongoose were absent (shaded bars...
<p>Non-indigenous invertebrate a) percent cover and b) species richness, native invertebrate c) perc...
<p>White bars represent species with high extinction risk, light gray represent species with low ext...
<p>The symbols indicate the posterior means and the bars indicate the 95% posterior intervals. The s...
<p>Proportion of potential habitat and diversity of arboreal marsupial groups (±1 SE) in urban, urba...
This is a standard phytocoenological table with trait data for each species. Species are in rows and...
<p>Lines within each panel show different selection criteria and removal rules, and the grey shaded ...
<p>Non-significant pairwise differences between land-use types are indicated by the presence of the ...
<p>Habitat suitability map indicating the number of arboreal marsupials groups across the urbanizati...
<p>Panels show how the metric of conservation value changes in primary forest (a & b), secondary for...
<p>Top left: LE—broad tolerance, optimum climate 5. Top right: HE—broad tolerance, optimum 2. Bottom...
<p>Species scores on the first compositional axis were used as an indicator of species association w...
<p>The box plot shows median, quartiles, 5- and 95-percentiles and extreme values. NB: Only two Aust...