<p>A, highest versus lowest intake. B, dose–response analysis (200 g/d). Weights are from random-effects analysis.</p
<p>A Forest plot of the effect size or standardized mean difference (standardized using the z-statis...
<p>*dotted line represented the combined effect estimate of meta-analysis. Size of square and rhombo...
<p>Forest plot of included studies for the highest versus lowest meta-analysis, stratified by zinc i...
<p>A, highest versus lowest intake. B, dose–response analysis (200 g/d). Weights are from random-eff...
<p>A, highest versus lowest intake. B, dose–response analysis (200 g/d). Weights are from random eff...
<p>A, total milk. B, low fat milk. C, full fat milk. Weights are from random-effects analysis.</p
<p>BMI, body mass index; n, the number of studies,P<sub>a</sub>, for heterogeneity within each subgr...
<p>Forest plot showing pooled OR/RR/HR with 95% CI for abdominal obesity comparing categories of mil...
<p>Forest plots of polyunsaturated fat intake and gastric cancer risk based on highest versus lowest...
<p>Forest plots of total fat intake and gastric cancer risk based on highest versus lowest analysis....
<p>Studies are ranked from low to high baseline triglyceride levels. Illustrates weighted mean diffe...
<p>Bars and the diamond indicate 95% CIs. The size of the squares corresponds to the weight of the s...
Smaller MDAs tend to be better discriminatory markers than the higher values.</p
<p>Forest plot of sensitivity analysis with median breastfeeding success and IQR.</p
RR and 95% CIs per cohort-specific range from the 10th to 90th percentiles are presented: dots from ...
<p>A Forest plot of the effect size or standardized mean difference (standardized using the z-statis...
<p>*dotted line represented the combined effect estimate of meta-analysis. Size of square and rhombo...
<p>Forest plot of included studies for the highest versus lowest meta-analysis, stratified by zinc i...
<p>A, highest versus lowest intake. B, dose–response analysis (200 g/d). Weights are from random-eff...
<p>A, highest versus lowest intake. B, dose–response analysis (200 g/d). Weights are from random eff...
<p>A, total milk. B, low fat milk. C, full fat milk. Weights are from random-effects analysis.</p
<p>BMI, body mass index; n, the number of studies,P<sub>a</sub>, for heterogeneity within each subgr...
<p>Forest plot showing pooled OR/RR/HR with 95% CI for abdominal obesity comparing categories of mil...
<p>Forest plots of polyunsaturated fat intake and gastric cancer risk based on highest versus lowest...
<p>Forest plots of total fat intake and gastric cancer risk based on highest versus lowest analysis....
<p>Studies are ranked from low to high baseline triglyceride levels. Illustrates weighted mean diffe...
<p>Bars and the diamond indicate 95% CIs. The size of the squares corresponds to the weight of the s...
Smaller MDAs tend to be better discriminatory markers than the higher values.</p
<p>Forest plot of sensitivity analysis with median breastfeeding success and IQR.</p
RR and 95% CIs per cohort-specific range from the 10th to 90th percentiles are presented: dots from ...
<p>A Forest plot of the effect size or standardized mean difference (standardized using the z-statis...
<p>*dotted line represented the combined effect estimate of meta-analysis. Size of square and rhombo...
<p>Forest plot of included studies for the highest versus lowest meta-analysis, stratified by zinc i...
DOI
Add to ORKG