<p>S: spironolactone; MI: myocardial infarction; BW: body weight; LVW: left ventricular weight; RVW: right ventricular weight; MHPO: myocardial hydroxyproline concentration; CSA: cross-sectional area. * data normalized for statistical analysis.</p>#<p>(SHAM=4; SHAM-S=5; MI=4; MI-S=4.) </p>**<p>(SHAM=8; SHAM-S=7; MI=6; MI-S=8.) </p><p>When interactions were observed, symbols show the significant differences (<sup>•</sup> MI≠MI-S and <sup>ƒ</sup> MI≠SHAM)</p
<p>All values are mean ± SD. Comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test....
* Significant difference vs. INF group, † Significant difference vs. Sham group.</p
<p>(a) Infarction and myocardial area ratio linear regression analysis of the two approaches. (b) Bl...
<p>(A) Cardiomyocite cross-sectional area (µm<sup>2</sup>); (B) cardiomyocyte nuclear volume (µm<sup...
<p>(A) Representative photograph of infarct size which was determined by 1% triphenyltetrazolium chl...
Myocardial infarct sizes of the normoglycemic Control hearts are depicted by the dark grey bars. Myo...
<p>Daily body mass (A), end haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) (B), and end mass of whole heart (WH), ...
<p>Representative micrographs were obtained from each group. The morphological location (A) and the ...
<p>Infarct size was measured after 30 min ischemia and 3 h reperfusion. Scale bars represent 10 mm. ...
<p>(A) Representative photomicrographs of myocardial sections stained with Masson's trichrome. Secti...
<p>Data displayed as mean ± SE relevant to each treatment group (diet/strain). The p-values derived ...
<p>A—Representative images of stained sections of myocardium obtained at day 14 of experiment (fibro...
Correlation analysis between mitophagy-related molecules and cardiac phenotypic readouts.</p
<p>A: cardiomyocyte diameter was significantly increased by hypoxia compared to normoxic controls. B...
<p>Scatter plot showing size of myocardial infarction (A), LV end-systolic dimension (B), and LV eje...
<p>All values are mean ± SD. Comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test....
* Significant difference vs. INF group, † Significant difference vs. Sham group.</p
<p>(a) Infarction and myocardial area ratio linear regression analysis of the two approaches. (b) Bl...
<p>(A) Cardiomyocite cross-sectional area (µm<sup>2</sup>); (B) cardiomyocyte nuclear volume (µm<sup...
<p>(A) Representative photograph of infarct size which was determined by 1% triphenyltetrazolium chl...
Myocardial infarct sizes of the normoglycemic Control hearts are depicted by the dark grey bars. Myo...
<p>Daily body mass (A), end haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) (B), and end mass of whole heart (WH), ...
<p>Representative micrographs were obtained from each group. The morphological location (A) and the ...
<p>Infarct size was measured after 30 min ischemia and 3 h reperfusion. Scale bars represent 10 mm. ...
<p>(A) Representative photomicrographs of myocardial sections stained with Masson's trichrome. Secti...
<p>Data displayed as mean ± SE relevant to each treatment group (diet/strain). The p-values derived ...
<p>A—Representative images of stained sections of myocardium obtained at day 14 of experiment (fibro...
Correlation analysis between mitophagy-related molecules and cardiac phenotypic readouts.</p
<p>A: cardiomyocyte diameter was significantly increased by hypoxia compared to normoxic controls. B...
<p>Scatter plot showing size of myocardial infarction (A), LV end-systolic dimension (B), and LV eje...
<p>All values are mean ± SD. Comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test....
* Significant difference vs. INF group, † Significant difference vs. Sham group.</p
<p>(a) Infarction and myocardial area ratio linear regression analysis of the two approaches. (b) Bl...