a<p>RTs in the overt trials in Experiment 1 are adjusted for the Simon effect.</p>b<p>Due to the low number of overt trials in Experiment 2 mean RTs for overt trials were available for only 11 out of 19 participants.</p
<p><i>Note.</i> SEM = Standard Error of the Mean,</p>*<p><i>p</i><.05, N = 45.</p
<p>All four days of testing were plotted together for comparison. The Simon effect was present for a...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...
<p>Mean correct RTs in ms, standard deviations (in brackets) for corresponding and non-corresponding...
<p>Mean correct RTs in ms, standard deviations (in brackets) for corresponding and non-corresponding...
<p>A significant reduction in the Simon effect (incongruent RTs—congruent RTs) and interference (inc...
<p>Mean RTs (<i>M</i>) and standard deviations (<i>SD</i>) for each experimental condition of the vi...
<p>The Simon effect (incongruent RTs—congruent RTs) differed significantly between positive manipula...
<p>The resulting gaze cueing effect (RT difference between invalid and valid trials) is indicated in...
International audienceStudies using reaction times (RTs) distribution methods find that the Simon ef...
The authors investigated whether a Simon effect could be observed in an accessory-stimulus Simon tas...
<p>Note: There were twenty participants in each group of participants.</p>*<p>p<0.05.</p
<p>RT was mainly modulated by the presence or absence of the previously selected object when the pre...
<p>The accuracy for the Unknown Face vs. Familiar Face task did not differ significantly from chance...
The study investigated whether the Simon effect, and its facilitation and interference components, s...
<p><i>Note.</i> SEM = Standard Error of the Mean,</p>*<p><i>p</i><.05, N = 45.</p
<p>All four days of testing were plotted together for comparison. The Simon effect was present for a...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...
<p>Mean correct RTs in ms, standard deviations (in brackets) for corresponding and non-corresponding...
<p>Mean correct RTs in ms, standard deviations (in brackets) for corresponding and non-corresponding...
<p>A significant reduction in the Simon effect (incongruent RTs—congruent RTs) and interference (inc...
<p>Mean RTs (<i>M</i>) and standard deviations (<i>SD</i>) for each experimental condition of the vi...
<p>The Simon effect (incongruent RTs—congruent RTs) differed significantly between positive manipula...
<p>The resulting gaze cueing effect (RT difference between invalid and valid trials) is indicated in...
International audienceStudies using reaction times (RTs) distribution methods find that the Simon ef...
The authors investigated whether a Simon effect could be observed in an accessory-stimulus Simon tas...
<p>Note: There were twenty participants in each group of participants.</p>*<p>p<0.05.</p
<p>RT was mainly modulated by the presence or absence of the previously selected object when the pre...
<p>The accuracy for the Unknown Face vs. Familiar Face task did not differ significantly from chance...
The study investigated whether the Simon effect, and its facilitation and interference components, s...
<p><i>Note.</i> SEM = Standard Error of the Mean,</p>*<p><i>p</i><.05, N = 45.</p
<p>All four days of testing were plotted together for comparison. The Simon effect was present for a...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...