<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. AR: All resources, J: JNLPBA model, U: UMLS and MetaMap, H:Human Phenotype Ontology, M: Mammalian Phenotype Ontology, G: Gene Dictionary from NCBI, L: Linnaeus, F: Foundation Model of Anatomy, P: Phenotypic Trait Ontology, C: Jochem's dictionary, B: Brenda Tissue Ontology, -: No significant difference. Significance is decided at p< = 0.05.</p
<p>Statistical significance (p-value and interactor score) of shared first degree interactors betwee...
<p>Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed to determine the statistical significance of comparing th...
The figure shows a histogram of the top 5% of the distribution of differences between the probabilit...
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Each horizontal row shows a combination of features and the associated F-scores for each class on...
<p>The evaluation system was based for the BP, CC and MF ontologies (<b>A</b>) including or (<b>B</b...
<p>Statistical significance tests (paired T-test) of the performance difference between the machine ...
<p>Statistical significance tests (paired T-test) of the performance difference between the machine ...
<p><b>Note</b>: “a” denotes binomial distribution used. Statistical analysis showed 0 cells (0.0%) h...
<p>The table contains the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected -values of the differences (using a Wilcoxon ...
<p>The entries in <b>bold</b> indicate statistically signifcant difference (p < 0.05).</p
For a given phenotype, expected number is equal to the percentage of all tested pathways belonging t...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Discovering functional linkages and uncharacteriz...
<p> values are grouped by linguistic phylum with each dot representing one population. The median pe...
In traditional research, repeated measurements lead to a sample of results, and inferential statisti...
<p>Statistical significance (p-value and interactor score) of shared first degree interactors betwee...
<p>Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed to determine the statistical significance of comparing th...
The figure shows a histogram of the top 5% of the distribution of differences between the probabilit...
<p>The entries in cells indicate that the two systems are significantly different in F-scores. CD ha...
<p>Each horizontal row shows a combination of features and the associated F-scores for each class on...
<p>The evaluation system was based for the BP, CC and MF ontologies (<b>A</b>) including or (<b>B</b...
<p>Statistical significance tests (paired T-test) of the performance difference between the machine ...
<p>Statistical significance tests (paired T-test) of the performance difference between the machine ...
<p><b>Note</b>: “a” denotes binomial distribution used. Statistical analysis showed 0 cells (0.0%) h...
<p>The table contains the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected -values of the differences (using a Wilcoxon ...
<p>The entries in <b>bold</b> indicate statistically signifcant difference (p < 0.05).</p
For a given phenotype, expected number is equal to the percentage of all tested pathways belonging t...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Discovering functional linkages and uncharacteriz...
<p> values are grouped by linguistic phylum with each dot representing one population. The median pe...
In traditional research, repeated measurements lead to a sample of results, and inferential statisti...
<p>Statistical significance (p-value and interactor score) of shared first degree interactors betwee...
<p>Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed to determine the statistical significance of comparing th...
The figure shows a histogram of the top 5% of the distribution of differences between the probabilit...