Pemisahan Harta Perkawinan melalui Permohonan Penetapan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Surakarta yang Dilakukan Setelah Perkawinan (Studi Kasus

The aims of this research are to know and answer the problem formulation the considerance of the judges\u27 of the Religion Court of Surakarta in stimulating the plea of the separation of marital treasure conducted after the marriage, the position of the stipulation of the religion court of Surakarta judges\u27 on the separation of the marital treasure after the marriage and Effects of Religious Court Decision No. Surakarta based on a Stipulation. 0012 / Pdt.P / 2015 / PA.Ska. This research is anormativeprescriptiveapproach- lawsandcase approach. Sources and types ofmaterialsusedlawisthe lawofprimary, secondaryandtertiary. Technicalliteraturecollectionandanalysisoflegalreasoning, deduction, alsousegrammatical interpretationandteleologicalinterpretation.Judge consideration is their negligence and ignorance of the applicant concerning the regulation of marriage Agreement; their desire to retain Land Rights. This determination notch along yet registered at authorized institutions and published in newspapers, the only binding and enforceable for the parties who made it just fine. As a result of Surakarta Religious Court Decision No. 0012 / Pdt.P / 2015 / PA.Ska against marriage after Marital Separation of Assets provide due to: The parties that made him (husband and wife) to comply with things - things that have been agreed in the agreement; Treasure marriages that treasure which was originally a joint property becomes the property of each - each party; Third parties concerned