<p>An example of the differences in vertical structure of areas differing in mean canopy height (MCH). A) LiDAR-derived mean canopy height (MCH) for a subset of the study area, polygons marked 1 and 2 delineate two patches of low and high canopy height, respectively. B) Vertical structure of areas 1 and 2 in panel A: horizontal dashed lines show the mean MCH, solid lines depict the median percentage of returns, and shaded areas show the 75<sup>th</sup> percentile.</p
Underestimation of LiDAR heights is widely known but has never been evaluated for several sensors an...
<p>Panels display the number of returns (normalized to 1000) for one-meter height classes for transe...
The dominant height of 73 georeferenced field sample plots were modeled from various canopy height m...
<p>Regression relationships between measured average canopy height (H) and lidar values using: a) Le...
Forest management plans are interesting to keep the forest stand natural composite and structure aft...
<p>Bars show average plot values for the field layer C stock measurements at sampling points located...
The vertical distribution of plant constituents is a key parameter to describe vegetation structure ...
Canopy structure, the vertical distribution of canopy material, is an important element of forest ec...
Abstract: LiDAR measurements of canopy structure can be used to classify forest stands into structur...
<p>Superscripts (A,B,C) identify post-hoc Tukey test results. Means with the same superscripted lett...
Airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) is used in forest inventories to quantify stand structure with three...
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2013Abstract Quantifying vertical and horizontal stand ...
<p>A) LiDAR-derived DEM and B) LiDAR-derived mean canopy height (MCH) for the study area (red polygo...
<p>(A) Field versus LiDAR measures of individual tree height (y = 0.92x + 6.35, RMSE = 2.49). (B) Pl...
The mean height and standard deviation of the height of the forest canopy, derived from lidar data s...
Underestimation of LiDAR heights is widely known but has never been evaluated for several sensors an...
<p>Panels display the number of returns (normalized to 1000) for one-meter height classes for transe...
The dominant height of 73 georeferenced field sample plots were modeled from various canopy height m...
<p>Regression relationships between measured average canopy height (H) and lidar values using: a) Le...
Forest management plans are interesting to keep the forest stand natural composite and structure aft...
<p>Bars show average plot values for the field layer C stock measurements at sampling points located...
The vertical distribution of plant constituents is a key parameter to describe vegetation structure ...
Canopy structure, the vertical distribution of canopy material, is an important element of forest ec...
Abstract: LiDAR measurements of canopy structure can be used to classify forest stands into structur...
<p>Superscripts (A,B,C) identify post-hoc Tukey test results. Means with the same superscripted lett...
Airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) is used in forest inventories to quantify stand structure with three...
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2013Abstract Quantifying vertical and horizontal stand ...
<p>A) LiDAR-derived DEM and B) LiDAR-derived mean canopy height (MCH) for the study area (red polygo...
<p>(A) Field versus LiDAR measures of individual tree height (y = 0.92x + 6.35, RMSE = 2.49). (B) Pl...
The mean height and standard deviation of the height of the forest canopy, derived from lidar data s...
Underestimation of LiDAR heights is widely known but has never been evaluated for several sensors an...
<p>Panels display the number of returns (normalized to 1000) for one-meter height classes for transe...
The dominant height of 73 georeferenced field sample plots were modeled from various canopy height m...