<p>Panel A: 2 Hz condition. Panel B: 1.5 Hz condition. Topographic headplots show the contingent negative variation (CNV) for both groups and the difference between the groups. Electrode showing significant amplitude difference in the prestimulus −50 to 0 ms interval after correcting for false positives are marked with larger disk. ERP traces are shown from the most significant electrode (marked with larger disk).</p
<p>Periods displaying significant amplitude differences between two outcome types over at least 20 m...
<p>Grand average ERPs averaged over 4 frontocentral electrodes for standard (dotted line), deviant (...
<p>Panel <b>a</b>: vegetative patients (VS). Panel <b>b</b>: minimally conscious patients (MCS). Pan...
<p>Top section shows the early condition differences (peaking at 110 ms and 170 ms), in a representa...
<p>The ERPs are shown of controls (upper 6 panels) and patients (middle 6 panels), at the same elect...
Stimuli that are task relevant elicit an averaged evoked potential (AEP) that shows an enhanced posi...
<div><p>(A) ERPs associated with chosen (magenta) and non-chosen (blue) stimuli, averaged across int...
<p>From A–C, ERP comparison between each pair of tasks at the electrode FCz during the preparatory p...
<p>Paired t-test values of significant potential amplitude differences at electrodes are illustrated...
<p>A: Grand average event-related brain potentials. ERPs evoked by positive and negative traits for ...
<p>Paired t-test values of significant potential amplitude differences at electrodes are illustrated...
<p>The two lower panels show ITC across frequencies from 0 to 40(right panel) and controls (left pan...
<p>Top row: Topographic comparison between V-A and A-A, and V-A and V-V (significant differences sho...
<p>(a) Top panel: schematic representation of the rivalry stimuli as a function of time for the firs...
<p>Analysis indicated a significant main group effect ranging from 460-posterior channels. A. Topogr...
<p>Periods displaying significant amplitude differences between two outcome types over at least 20 m...
<p>Grand average ERPs averaged over 4 frontocentral electrodes for standard (dotted line), deviant (...
<p>Panel <b>a</b>: vegetative patients (VS). Panel <b>b</b>: minimally conscious patients (MCS). Pan...
<p>Top section shows the early condition differences (peaking at 110 ms and 170 ms), in a representa...
<p>The ERPs are shown of controls (upper 6 panels) and patients (middle 6 panels), at the same elect...
Stimuli that are task relevant elicit an averaged evoked potential (AEP) that shows an enhanced posi...
<div><p>(A) ERPs associated with chosen (magenta) and non-chosen (blue) stimuli, averaged across int...
<p>From A–C, ERP comparison between each pair of tasks at the electrode FCz during the preparatory p...
<p>Paired t-test values of significant potential amplitude differences at electrodes are illustrated...
<p>A: Grand average event-related brain potentials. ERPs evoked by positive and negative traits for ...
<p>Paired t-test values of significant potential amplitude differences at electrodes are illustrated...
<p>The two lower panels show ITC across frequencies from 0 to 40(right panel) and controls (left pan...
<p>Top row: Topographic comparison between V-A and A-A, and V-A and V-V (significant differences sho...
<p>(a) Top panel: schematic representation of the rivalry stimuli as a function of time for the firs...
<p>Analysis indicated a significant main group effect ranging from 460-posterior channels. A. Topogr...
<p>Periods displaying significant amplitude differences between two outcome types over at least 20 m...
<p>Grand average ERPs averaged over 4 frontocentral electrodes for standard (dotted line), deviant (...
<p>Panel <b>a</b>: vegetative patients (VS). Panel <b>b</b>: minimally conscious patients (MCS). Pan...