Considers the effect of the House of Lords decision in India v India Steamship Co Ltd (The Indian Endurance and The Indian Grace) (No.2) that an action in rem brought in the Admiralty Court is an action against the owners. Highlights criticisms of the decision by the Australian Federal Court in Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd for failing to explain key features of the Admiralty jurisdiction, including the place of the maritime lien in the context of an action in rem and the traditional separateness of the judgment on the action in personam and in rem
In Cline v. Price the owners of a minority interest in a fishing vessel, being dissatisfied with the...
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, a...
While loading grain aboard a ship, the petitioners, longshoremen, were injured when they inhaled nox...
The operation of admiralty jurisdiction depends on well known features. Maritime lien being a histor...
In Wilmington Trust Company (Trustee) v The Ship "Houston" [2016] FCA 1349 the Federal Court of Aust...
In the May 1975 issue of 'Id-Dritt', there was an article on 'Actions in Rem and Exclusive Jurisdict...
The High Court of Australia has recently altered the manner of distinguishing between substance and ...
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals published six admiralty opinions in 1999. The court faced one ...
For over a century American courts and text writers have referred to the administration of a deceden...
Emphasizing the extent of equity discretion available to admiralty courts, the Court of Appeals for ...
In Korea Shipping Corporation v Lord Energy SA [2018] FCAFC 1717, the Full Court of the Federal Cour...
In England and its former colonies ship arrest(1) is an interim procedure overseen by courts exercis...
The decision of Alstom Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Co1 concerns the issue of the proximate cause ...
The maritime lien plays an important role in facilitating the smooth operation of maritime commerce....
Libelant linehandler, injured undocking a vessel, brought a personal injury action against the shipo...
In Cline v. Price the owners of a minority interest in a fishing vessel, being dissatisfied with the...
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, a...
While loading grain aboard a ship, the petitioners, longshoremen, were injured when they inhaled nox...
The operation of admiralty jurisdiction depends on well known features. Maritime lien being a histor...
In Wilmington Trust Company (Trustee) v The Ship "Houston" [2016] FCA 1349 the Federal Court of Aust...
In the May 1975 issue of 'Id-Dritt', there was an article on 'Actions in Rem and Exclusive Jurisdict...
The High Court of Australia has recently altered the manner of distinguishing between substance and ...
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals published six admiralty opinions in 1999. The court faced one ...
For over a century American courts and text writers have referred to the administration of a deceden...
Emphasizing the extent of equity discretion available to admiralty courts, the Court of Appeals for ...
In Korea Shipping Corporation v Lord Energy SA [2018] FCAFC 1717, the Full Court of the Federal Cour...
In England and its former colonies ship arrest(1) is an interim procedure overseen by courts exercis...
The decision of Alstom Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Co1 concerns the issue of the proximate cause ...
The maritime lien plays an important role in facilitating the smooth operation of maritime commerce....
Libelant linehandler, injured undocking a vessel, brought a personal injury action against the shipo...
In Cline v. Price the owners of a minority interest in a fishing vessel, being dissatisfied with the...
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, a...
While loading grain aboard a ship, the petitioners, longshoremen, were injured when they inhaled nox...