<p>Delayed gains were computed as the difference in errors and speed between T3 and T2, and then normalized for the difference in T2, the delayed gains=(T3-T2)/T2. Note that for errors, a negative value indicates a gain in accuracy, whereas for speed, a larger value indicates more sequences performed within the test interval.</p
<p>Time for the active form (TR*) to reach a threshold is registered versus the time difference betw...
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
<p>(a) Model predictions of psychometric and chronometric functions for different values of . (b) Co...
In two experiments, we used response signals (RSs) to control processing time and trace out speed ac...
Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...
<p><b><i>A</i></b>: Time effect as the difference in training performance between SHORT-ITI and LONG...
<p>A: A schematic depiction of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SATO). As reaction time (RT) increases,...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>The more negative M-duration difference reflects a stronger transfer of learning effect. Error ba...
<p>Group means for mean delayed performance gains in Session 2, normalized to performance in the fin...
<p>A) Network performance as a function of the number of training trials for interleaved training wi...
Deadlines (DLs) and response signals (RSs) are two well-established techniques for investigating spe...
<p>Mean delayed performance gains in Session 2, normalized to performance in the final block of Sess...
Errors and their consequences are typically studied by investigating changes in decision speed and a...
<p>Time for the active form (TR*) to reach a threshold is registered versus the time difference betw...
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
<p>(a) Model predictions of psychometric and chronometric functions for different values of . (b) Co...
In two experiments, we used response signals (RSs) to control processing time and trace out speed ac...
Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...
<p><b><i>A</i></b>: Time effect as the difference in training performance between SHORT-ITI and LONG...
<p>A: A schematic depiction of the speed-accuracy trade-off (SATO). As reaction time (RT) increases,...
<p>A: Stacked difference scores (follow-up compared to session 1) for the five trained tasks for the...
<p>The more negative M-duration difference reflects a stronger transfer of learning effect. Error ba...
<p>Group means for mean delayed performance gains in Session 2, normalized to performance in the fin...
<p>A) Network performance as a function of the number of training trials for interleaved training wi...
Deadlines (DLs) and response signals (RSs) are two well-established techniques for investigating spe...
<p>Mean delayed performance gains in Session 2, normalized to performance in the final block of Sess...
Errors and their consequences are typically studied by investigating changes in decision speed and a...
<p>Time for the active form (TR*) to reach a threshold is registered versus the time difference betw...
<p>T1 and T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs...
<p>T2 accuracy as a function of current lag (trial n, 2 vs. 8), previous lag (trial n-1, 2 vs. 8 vs....
DOI
Add to ORKG