<p>Individual rows report mean, standard errors, and number of participants for each variable, separately for each of the four experimental conditions. The F and p values of the Stress × Timing interaction effects are reported. Tom. = Tomorrow; m = months and one day.</p
<p>Descriptive statistics of SS% and RT during the intertemporal choice task.</p
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<p><b>A</b> The observed distribution of consumption at the group level by participants for whom ant...
<p>Individual rows report mean, standard errors, minimum and maximum values, and number of participa...
<p>Robust standard errors in parentheses.</p>*<p><i>p</i><0.10,</p>**<p><i>p</i><0.05.</p
<p>Indifference points mark the subjective value at each interval between soon/small and late/large ...
<p>The frequency of choosing sooner pain in the binary intertemporal choice experiment which provide...
<p>Left: Correlation between likeability rating and simulation richness (number of details reported ...
International audienceAllowing for sign-dependence in discounting substantially improves the descrip...
<p>Model equations for five prominent models of inter-temporal choice; <i>SV</i> – subjective (disco...
Formal comparisons of delay discounting models have been conducted using data from humans, with only...
<p>Empirical indifference points obtained in cognitive (left panel) and physical (right panel) effor...
This paper examines whether individual's intertemporal choice is affected under time pressure. We re...
Standard models of intertemporal choice assume that individuals discount future payoffs by integrati...
Decisions where costs and benefits are spread over time are both common and important. Delayed outco...
<p>Descriptive statistics of SS% and RT during the intertemporal choice task.</p
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<p><b>A</b> The observed distribution of consumption at the group level by participants for whom ant...
<p>Individual rows report mean, standard errors, minimum and maximum values, and number of participa...
<p>Robust standard errors in parentheses.</p>*<p><i>p</i><0.10,</p>**<p><i>p</i><0.05.</p
<p>Indifference points mark the subjective value at each interval between soon/small and late/large ...
<p>The frequency of choosing sooner pain in the binary intertemporal choice experiment which provide...
<p>Left: Correlation between likeability rating and simulation richness (number of details reported ...
International audienceAllowing for sign-dependence in discounting substantially improves the descrip...
<p>Model equations for five prominent models of inter-temporal choice; <i>SV</i> – subjective (disco...
Formal comparisons of delay discounting models have been conducted using data from humans, with only...
<p>Empirical indifference points obtained in cognitive (left panel) and physical (right panel) effor...
This paper examines whether individual's intertemporal choice is affected under time pressure. We re...
Standard models of intertemporal choice assume that individuals discount future payoffs by integrati...
Decisions where costs and benefits are spread over time are both common and important. Delayed outco...
<p>Descriptive statistics of SS% and RT during the intertemporal choice task.</p
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
<p><b>A</b> The observed distribution of consumption at the group level by participants for whom ant...