<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpening. In this instance, the Tsa range of each group was equal.</p
<p>If this line lies in the tail end of the distribution then the difference is unlikely to have occ...
<p><b>G.L.</b>: greatest length in mm; <b>Edge Fractures</b>: type of flake scars along cutting edge...
Stone tools were knapped, not built. This truism means that tools were reduced from larger pieces in...
<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via ...
<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via ...
<p>This result supports the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpe...
<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via ...
<p>This result supports the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpe...
<p>This result supports the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpe...
<p>There is no significant correlation between % of broken unifacial stone tools and spurs-per-unifa...
Paleoindian unifacial stone tools frequently exhibit distinct, sharp projections, known as "spurs". ...
It is herein proposed that there is an alternative explanation for the intentional dulling of tool m...
It has long been assumed that Folsom points are more standardized than Clovis points, although an ad...
An experimental model derived from ballistics tests has recently shown that the size of a flaked sto...
Many stone tools are reduced during use. Degree and pattern of reduction influence tool size and for...
<p>If this line lies in the tail end of the distribution then the difference is unlikely to have occ...
<p><b>G.L.</b>: greatest length in mm; <b>Edge Fractures</b>: type of flake scars along cutting edge...
Stone tools were knapped, not built. This truism means that tools were reduced from larger pieces in...
<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via ...
<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via ...
<p>This result supports the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpe...
<p>This result does not support the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via ...
<p>This result supports the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpe...
<p>This result supports the notion that spurs were created incidentally or accidentally via resharpe...
<p>There is no significant correlation between % of broken unifacial stone tools and spurs-per-unifa...
Paleoindian unifacial stone tools frequently exhibit distinct, sharp projections, known as "spurs". ...
It is herein proposed that there is an alternative explanation for the intentional dulling of tool m...
It has long been assumed that Folsom points are more standardized than Clovis points, although an ad...
An experimental model derived from ballistics tests has recently shown that the size of a flaked sto...
Many stone tools are reduced during use. Degree and pattern of reduction influence tool size and for...
<p>If this line lies in the tail end of the distribution then the difference is unlikely to have occ...
<p><b>G.L.</b>: greatest length in mm; <b>Edge Fractures</b>: type of flake scars along cutting edge...
Stone tools were knapped, not built. This truism means that tools were reduced from larger pieces in...