<p>Subjects are assigned to groups ‘A’, ‘B’ or ‘C’ according to the accuracy of their performance.</p
Performance of tested case ascertainment algorithms on training and validation sets (medical charts ...
<p>Accuracy: Mean±SE</p><p>Response time: Mean±SEM</p><p>Summary of group behavioral performance met...
Comparisons of PEERS performances between TDC and clinical groups–scaled and composite scores.</p
<p>Total correct score on the Eyes test for each individual is plotted as a dot, coloured according ...
<p>The performance error (A) and success rate (B) were averaged per group and are indicated with bar...
<p>Note the different scales between the subjects from the Cued group and the Uncued group. Each sub...
<p>Accuracy data by group for discrete magnitude comparison tasks as a function of ratio.</p
<p>Subjects were first objectively divided into two groups a priori according to their performance o...
<p> <i>Performance is listed as the number of correct responses (maximum = 60) with...
Accuracy of the CAD systems in different population subgroups (MRS analysis population).</p
<p>Proportion of tester groups who achieved a specified level of accuracy in PT1 and PT2.</p
<p>The accuracy summary for the cluster assignment is based on 50 simulated datasets under each mode...
Performance for each individual experienced IECW for the live subject grading test, relative to the ...
<p>Accuracy and F<sub>1</sub> score achieved by the final MLP model when predicting the activity ove...
<p>(For MLPD, all the available data is used, but the classification results for the subjects in tas...
Performance of tested case ascertainment algorithms on training and validation sets (medical charts ...
<p>Accuracy: Mean±SE</p><p>Response time: Mean±SEM</p><p>Summary of group behavioral performance met...
Comparisons of PEERS performances between TDC and clinical groups–scaled and composite scores.</p
<p>Total correct score on the Eyes test for each individual is plotted as a dot, coloured according ...
<p>The performance error (A) and success rate (B) were averaged per group and are indicated with bar...
<p>Note the different scales between the subjects from the Cued group and the Uncued group. Each sub...
<p>Accuracy data by group for discrete magnitude comparison tasks as a function of ratio.</p
<p>Subjects were first objectively divided into two groups a priori according to their performance o...
<p> <i>Performance is listed as the number of correct responses (maximum = 60) with...
Accuracy of the CAD systems in different population subgroups (MRS analysis population).</p
<p>Proportion of tester groups who achieved a specified level of accuracy in PT1 and PT2.</p
<p>The accuracy summary for the cluster assignment is based on 50 simulated datasets under each mode...
Performance for each individual experienced IECW for the live subject grading test, relative to the ...
<p>Accuracy and F<sub>1</sub> score achieved by the final MLP model when predicting the activity ove...
<p>(For MLPD, all the available data is used, but the classification results for the subjects in tas...
Performance of tested case ascertainment algorithms on training and validation sets (medical charts ...
<p>Accuracy: Mean±SE</p><p>Response time: Mean±SEM</p><p>Summary of group behavioral performance met...
Comparisons of PEERS performances between TDC and clinical groups–scaled and composite scores.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG