Results of the ECM constrasts high <i>E</i>_κ vs. low <i>E</i>_κ.

<p>In the left column, percentages in brackets following anatomical structures refer to anatomical probabilities according to the SPM Anatomy Toolbox <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077196#pone.0077196-Eickhoff1" target="_blank">[102]</a>. The next columns provide MNI-coordinates, cluster sizes, and <i>z</i>-values of maxima indicated by the analysis in which one single ECM per participant (calculated for the entire fMRI session) entered the second-level analysis. Results were corrected for multiple comparisons (<i>p</i><.05). The three remaining columns on the right indicate maximal <i>z</i>-values in the respective structures when ECMs were computed separately for each emotion condition (joy, fear, and neutral, see Methods). Abbreviations: aFMC: anterior fronto-median cortex; g.: gyrus; l: left; parahipp.: parahippocampal; post.: posterior; r: right; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; ECM: Eigenvector Centrality Mapping; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; LGB: lateral geniculate body of the thalamus; MTG: middle temporal gyrus; Rol.operc.: Rolandic operculum; STG: superior temporal gyrus; SUB: subiculum of the hippocampal formation; Th-visual: visual thalamic nuclei; V1: primary visual cortex; WM: white matter.</p>1<p>The cluster with the peak voxel in the r parahipp. g. had another local maximum in the SUB.</p>2<p>The cluster with the peak voxel in the r ACC had another local maximum in the aFMC.</p>3<p>The cluster with the peak voxel in the l STG had another local maximum in the Rol. operc.</p>4<p>The cluster with the peak voxel in V1 had another local maximum in the cerebellum.</p>5<p>The cluster with the peak voxel in the WM had another local maximum in the l LGB.</p>6<p>The cluster with the peak voxel in the r striatum had another local maximum in the r LGB.