<p>Column 6 indicates whether the observed difference was statistically significant.</p
<p>Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.</...
<p>A comparison of the effects among Analysis I, II, III and IV on each outcome in terms of the stat...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
<p>Column 3 is the difference between the observed scores. Column 4 indicates whether the observed d...
<p>The comparisons of histopathology scores among five experimental groups (*Significant difference ...
<p>Results of the KS tests for the last six glances of the radio tuning tasks; each cell entry shows...
<p>Red columns are data for non-overlapping targets, while blue columns are data for overlapping tar...
<p>The first column shows the comparison of each pair (A,B) including the hedges’ g values of A winn...
<p>The first column shows the comparison of each pair (A,B) including the hedges’ g values of A winn...
<p>Results of the pairwise contrasts between groups for the four variables found to be significant i...
<p>Results of the KS test for the first six glances of data set A for the radio tuning tasks; each c...
Comparison of the experimental data from the literature with the simulation results of this study.</...
<p>(A) Percentage of correct responses and coefficients of variation as a function of condition and ...
<p>Note: *p<0.05, ***p<.001.</p><p>Mean K value differences in Experiment 1a (Bonferroni corrected p...
<p>Different letters in the same column indicate statistical significant differences (P<0.05).</p
<p>Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.</...
<p>A comparison of the effects among Analysis I, II, III and IV on each outcome in terms of the stat...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
<p>Column 3 is the difference between the observed scores. Column 4 indicates whether the observed d...
<p>The comparisons of histopathology scores among five experimental groups (*Significant difference ...
<p>Results of the KS tests for the last six glances of the radio tuning tasks; each cell entry shows...
<p>Red columns are data for non-overlapping targets, while blue columns are data for overlapping tar...
<p>The first column shows the comparison of each pair (A,B) including the hedges’ g values of A winn...
<p>The first column shows the comparison of each pair (A,B) including the hedges’ g values of A winn...
<p>Results of the pairwise contrasts between groups for the four variables found to be significant i...
<p>Results of the KS test for the first six glances of data set A for the radio tuning tasks; each c...
Comparison of the experimental data from the literature with the simulation results of this study.</...
<p>(A) Percentage of correct responses and coefficients of variation as a function of condition and ...
<p>Note: *p<0.05, ***p<.001.</p><p>Mean K value differences in Experiment 1a (Bonferroni corrected p...
<p>Different letters in the same column indicate statistical significant differences (P<0.05).</p
<p>Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.</...
<p>A comparison of the effects among Analysis I, II, III and IV on each outcome in terms of the stat...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG