<p>(A) Oddball paradigm. Tones (A and B) used for standard (s) and deviant (d) were alternated in Block 1 and Block 2. Deviant tones were randomly delivered with an appearance probability of 10%. (B) Many standards control paradigm (MSC). Tones with 10 different frequencies were presented randomly. Note that the appearance probability (10%) of each tone was identical to that of the deviants in the oddball paradigm.</p
<p>Each visual target was preceded by one of several standard tones that together formed a repetitiv...
<p>(A) Representative mapping of AEP. These responses were obtained from 40,317 Hz tones under indic...
<p>Mean amplitudes (in µV) and standard errors (in parentheses) elicited by standard (std) and devia...
<p>In deviant sequences one note at a random position (large dot) was shifted one tone up or down, u...
<p>A. B. and C. Two-tone sequences: in each trial, either f1 or f2 are presented pseudo-randomly acc...
<p>During one experimental block, checkerboards with two different checksizes were presented in rand...
This repository contains 14 .csv data files. Each contains auditory evoked potential data from 14 an...
<p>(A) P1 and negative deflection that follows are quantified in indicated conditions: St. and Dv., ...
<p>Levels of significance for the statistical difference between responses to deviant and standard s...
Electrophysiological sensory deviance detection signals, such as the mismatch negativity (MMN), have...
<p>Each visual target was preceded by one of three standard tones that together formed a repetitive ...
<p>(A) The experiment was composed of eight five-minute blocks. The gender of the voice to be attend...
<p>The stimuli were presented within an oddball paradigm. In the deviant stimulus the last tone was ...
<p>The deviants were F#5 (i.e., a small deviation from the replaced tone and an unexpected sequence-...
<p>Top: Frequency deviants in controls (A) and patients (B); bottom: Duration deviants in controls (...
<p>Each visual target was preceded by one of several standard tones that together formed a repetitiv...
<p>(A) Representative mapping of AEP. These responses were obtained from 40,317 Hz tones under indic...
<p>Mean amplitudes (in µV) and standard errors (in parentheses) elicited by standard (std) and devia...
<p>In deviant sequences one note at a random position (large dot) was shifted one tone up or down, u...
<p>A. B. and C. Two-tone sequences: in each trial, either f1 or f2 are presented pseudo-randomly acc...
<p>During one experimental block, checkerboards with two different checksizes were presented in rand...
This repository contains 14 .csv data files. Each contains auditory evoked potential data from 14 an...
<p>(A) P1 and negative deflection that follows are quantified in indicated conditions: St. and Dv., ...
<p>Levels of significance for the statistical difference between responses to deviant and standard s...
Electrophysiological sensory deviance detection signals, such as the mismatch negativity (MMN), have...
<p>Each visual target was preceded by one of three standard tones that together formed a repetitive ...
<p>(A) The experiment was composed of eight five-minute blocks. The gender of the voice to be attend...
<p>The stimuli were presented within an oddball paradigm. In the deviant stimulus the last tone was ...
<p>The deviants were F#5 (i.e., a small deviation from the replaced tone and an unexpected sequence-...
<p>Top: Frequency deviants in controls (A) and patients (B); bottom: Duration deviants in controls (...
<p>Each visual target was preceded by one of several standard tones that together formed a repetitiv...
<p>(A) Representative mapping of AEP. These responses were obtained from 40,317 Hz tones under indic...
<p>Mean amplitudes (in µV) and standard errors (in parentheses) elicited by standard (std) and devia...