<p>Amplitudes are reported in µV; latencies are reported in milliseconds. n.s. = not significant.</p
<p>Mean estimated frequency for the 4–8 Hz component for IC and NC conditions (top left), ANOVA p-va...
<p>Mean values (±SD) for latencies of M50, M70, and M100 auditory evoked responses to binaural tone ...
Correlations between the electrophysiological data and OCTA parameters in moderate to severe POAG.</...
<p>Summary of the repeated-measures ANOVAs on the mean amplitudes and peak latencies for the P1, N1,...
<p>Note: The ANOVAs were based on the mean amplitude in 300–450 ms and 450–600 ms latency ranges. Th...
<p>Results of the ANOVAs on mean amplitudes for N1, N2, P300 and LPP components.</p
<p>Intergroup one-way ANOVA showed no significant differences. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM.</p
<p>The results of repeated-measures univariate ANOVAs for heart rate and skin conductance.</p
<p>Results of the repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for the EMG channel pairs that attained significa...
<p>–: Not significant.</p><p>CAP: CAP subtype (A1, A2, A3).</p><p>Duration: Phase A duration (S = sh...
<p>Notes: MEP = peak-to-peak amplitude of the motor evoked potential; RMT = resting motor threshold;...
<p>On the left side, fifty-eight of the 64 EEG electrodes used are depicted. The red electrodes were...
<p>The results of ANOVA for the amplitudes of N100-P150, N2, P3 and LPP components.</p
<p>Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. N = 7.</p><p>The mean amplitude and peak latency of On- and ...
<p>The one-way repeated measures ANOVA test results for the windowed average ERPs with 25 ms analysi...
<p>Mean estimated frequency for the 4–8 Hz component for IC and NC conditions (top left), ANOVA p-va...
<p>Mean values (±SD) for latencies of M50, M70, and M100 auditory evoked responses to binaural tone ...
Correlations between the electrophysiological data and OCTA parameters in moderate to severe POAG.</...
<p>Summary of the repeated-measures ANOVAs on the mean amplitudes and peak latencies for the P1, N1,...
<p>Note: The ANOVAs were based on the mean amplitude in 300–450 ms and 450–600 ms latency ranges. Th...
<p>Results of the ANOVAs on mean amplitudes for N1, N2, P300 and LPP components.</p
<p>Intergroup one-way ANOVA showed no significant differences. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM.</p
<p>The results of repeated-measures univariate ANOVAs for heart rate and skin conductance.</p
<p>Results of the repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for the EMG channel pairs that attained significa...
<p>–: Not significant.</p><p>CAP: CAP subtype (A1, A2, A3).</p><p>Duration: Phase A duration (S = sh...
<p>Notes: MEP = peak-to-peak amplitude of the motor evoked potential; RMT = resting motor threshold;...
<p>On the left side, fifty-eight of the 64 EEG electrodes used are depicted. The red electrodes were...
<p>The results of ANOVA for the amplitudes of N100-P150, N2, P3 and LPP components.</p
<p>Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. N = 7.</p><p>The mean amplitude and peak latency of On- and ...
<p>The one-way repeated measures ANOVA test results for the windowed average ERPs with 25 ms analysi...
<p>Mean estimated frequency for the 4–8 Hz component for IC and NC conditions (top left), ANOVA p-va...
<p>Mean values (±SD) for latencies of M50, M70, and M100 auditory evoked responses to binaural tone ...
Correlations between the electrophysiological data and OCTA parameters in moderate to severe POAG.</...
DOI
Add to ORKG