<p>Values are mean ± SEM (number of cells).</p>†<p>Flash strength that elicited a half-maximal response.</p>††<p>Hill coefficient describing the flash intensity-response relation.</p>‡<p>Amplitude of a response to a dim flash estimated to elicit approximately 1 R* per rod.</p>†††<p>Dark-adapted sensitivity: flash response amplitude divided by flash strength.</p
<p>Dark-adapted <i>WT</i> (black) and <i>Pd<sup>−/−</sup></i> (gray) RBCs were presented with a satu...
<p>Each trace was an average obtained from 17 to 45 rods, where the contribution from each rod was i...
<p>(A) Representative families of responses to flashes that activated between 0.1 and 60 R*/rod. (B)...
<p>Values are mean ± SEM (number of cells).</p>†<p>Flash strength that elicited a half-maximal respo...
We recorded ganzfeld scotopic ERGs to examine the responses of human rod bipolar cells in vivo, duri...
Normalized mean current response amplitudes (± SE) as a function of flash intensity for rods and con...
To examine the dark adaptation of human rod bipolar cells in vivo, we recorded ganzfeld ERGs to (a) ...
<p>(A) Composite I-R relationships created by fitting Hill equations to the averaged response amplit...
<p>(A) Mean normalized SPR amplitudes from 21 <i>WT</i> rods (black) and 17 <i>Pd<sup>−/−</sup></i> ...
<p>Left column of traces show the collected average response (black), +/- standard deviation (red) a...
The ability of the eye to distinguish between intermittently presented flash stimuli is a measure of...
<p>Parameters for both WT and GCAP1<sup>−/−</sup> mice average all rods of each type and include “fa...
AbstractWe investigated the impact of rod-bipolar signal transfer on visual sensitivity. Two observa...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Responses to flashes delivering 719,500 (red) and 144,600 (blue) photons µm<sup>−2</su...
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between stimulus intensity and response am...
<p>Dark-adapted <i>WT</i> (black) and <i>Pd<sup>−/−</sup></i> (gray) RBCs were presented with a satu...
<p>Each trace was an average obtained from 17 to 45 rods, where the contribution from each rod was i...
<p>(A) Representative families of responses to flashes that activated between 0.1 and 60 R*/rod. (B)...
<p>Values are mean ± SEM (number of cells).</p>†<p>Flash strength that elicited a half-maximal respo...
We recorded ganzfeld scotopic ERGs to examine the responses of human rod bipolar cells in vivo, duri...
Normalized mean current response amplitudes (± SE) as a function of flash intensity for rods and con...
To examine the dark adaptation of human rod bipolar cells in vivo, we recorded ganzfeld ERGs to (a) ...
<p>(A) Composite I-R relationships created by fitting Hill equations to the averaged response amplit...
<p>(A) Mean normalized SPR amplitudes from 21 <i>WT</i> rods (black) and 17 <i>Pd<sup>−/−</sup></i> ...
<p>Left column of traces show the collected average response (black), +/- standard deviation (red) a...
The ability of the eye to distinguish between intermittently presented flash stimuli is a measure of...
<p>Parameters for both WT and GCAP1<sup>−/−</sup> mice average all rods of each type and include “fa...
AbstractWe investigated the impact of rod-bipolar signal transfer on visual sensitivity. Two observa...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Responses to flashes delivering 719,500 (red) and 144,600 (blue) photons µm<sup>−2</su...
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between stimulus intensity and response am...
<p>Dark-adapted <i>WT</i> (black) and <i>Pd<sup>−/−</sup></i> (gray) RBCs were presented with a satu...
<p>Each trace was an average obtained from 17 to 45 rods, where the contribution from each rod was i...
<p>(A) Representative families of responses to flashes that activated between 0.1 and 60 R*/rod. (B)...