<p>Errors bars show standard error of the mean, to illustrate the variability in the data.</p
<p>Mean positional-specificity effect size (<i>t</i> values [<i>SD</i>]), by scanner.</p
<p>Recall performance as a function of auditory distractor condition (quiet, changing state ending, ...
<p>A. Before warm-up. B. After warm-up. *, post-hoc effect showing that before warm-up sway was redu...
<p>Errors bars show standard error of the mean, to illustrate the variability in the data.</p
<p>The improvement from averaging two estimates from different versus the same locations was now sig...
<p>The figure illustrates the statistically significant interaction between target distance (nearby ...
<p>The figure illustrates the statistically significant effect of days. The error bars represent sta...
<p>The figure shows spot-the-differences task accuracy (left panel) and speed (right panel) as a fun...
<p>Mean T2|T1 accuracy for the related and unrelated priming conditions, plotted as a function of th...
<p><b>A</b>. Horizontal variability of the position of the tap with respect to the static target. <b...
<p>*, post-hoc effect for the Sick group, sway was reduced during performance of the Search task, re...
<p>Mean response times (upper panel) and accuracy (bottom panel) at the ...
<p>Mean position variability values (a–b) and mean velocity variability values (c–d) for both groups...
Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...
<p>Error bars depict standard errors. Note that the ordinate differs in the two figures.</p
<p>Mean positional-specificity effect size (<i>t</i> values [<i>SD</i>]), by scanner.</p
<p>Recall performance as a function of auditory distractor condition (quiet, changing state ending, ...
<p>A. Before warm-up. B. After warm-up. *, post-hoc effect showing that before warm-up sway was redu...
<p>Errors bars show standard error of the mean, to illustrate the variability in the data.</p
<p>The improvement from averaging two estimates from different versus the same locations was now sig...
<p>The figure illustrates the statistically significant interaction between target distance (nearby ...
<p>The figure illustrates the statistically significant effect of days. The error bars represent sta...
<p>The figure shows spot-the-differences task accuracy (left panel) and speed (right panel) as a fun...
<p>Mean T2|T1 accuracy for the related and unrelated priming conditions, plotted as a function of th...
<p><b>A</b>. Horizontal variability of the position of the tap with respect to the static target. <b...
<p>*, post-hoc effect for the Sick group, sway was reduced during performance of the Search task, re...
<p>Mean response times (upper panel) and accuracy (bottom panel) at the ...
<p>Mean position variability values (a–b) and mean velocity variability values (c–d) for both groups...
Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...
<p>Error bars depict standard errors. Note that the ordinate differs in the two figures.</p
<p>Mean positional-specificity effect size (<i>t</i> values [<i>SD</i>]), by scanner.</p
<p>Recall performance as a function of auditory distractor condition (quiet, changing state ending, ...
<p>A. Before warm-up. B. After warm-up. *, post-hoc effect showing that before warm-up sway was redu...
DOI
Add to ORKG