<p>Values show κ coefficients. A, B and C refers to each reviewer. CC, corpus callosum; RC, rostral commissure; Fx, fornix.</p
*<p>The combination of Clinician 1 (“A”) and Clinician 3 (“B”) together reviewed 2 batches of studie...
The top panel (A) shows the agreement between treatment arms among those who were more likely to agr...
Agreement between pairs of reviewers with respect to positive versus negative PET/CT by Qual4PS usin...
Weighted kappa coefficients (95% CI) assessing agreement between the readers.</p
<p>Agreement and corresponding kappa coefficient between readers for EORCT and PERCIST.</p
The ability to measure how closely raters agree when providing subjective evaluations is a need comm...
<p>Analysis of (dis)agreement among aggregators in Mendeley readership counts.</p
<p>Figures are observed percent agreement and kappa statistic for independent rating of 202 codes by...
<p>Cohen's kappa for this 3×3 cross table: 0.059 [95%-CI: −0.016–0.134], Spearman's r: 0.17 (p<0.000...
<p>Pearson correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) provides good information about the closeness of the r...
The degree of inter-rater agreement is usually assessed through (Formula presented.) -type coefficie...
The aim of this study is to introduce weighted inter-rater agreement statistics used in ordinal scal...
Distribution of panelists’ levels of agreement with statements used in Round 3 and median scores.</p
<p><sup>1</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p>Inter-rater agreement of physician raters and C-AEP reviewers.</...
<p>Positive agreement denotes agreement regarding acceptance, negative agreement refers to agreement...
*<p>The combination of Clinician 1 (“A”) and Clinician 3 (“B”) together reviewed 2 batches of studie...
The top panel (A) shows the agreement between treatment arms among those who were more likely to agr...
Agreement between pairs of reviewers with respect to positive versus negative PET/CT by Qual4PS usin...
Weighted kappa coefficients (95% CI) assessing agreement between the readers.</p
<p>Agreement and corresponding kappa coefficient between readers for EORCT and PERCIST.</p
The ability to measure how closely raters agree when providing subjective evaluations is a need comm...
<p>Analysis of (dis)agreement among aggregators in Mendeley readership counts.</p
<p>Figures are observed percent agreement and kappa statistic for independent rating of 202 codes by...
<p>Cohen's kappa for this 3×3 cross table: 0.059 [95%-CI: −0.016–0.134], Spearman's r: 0.17 (p<0.000...
<p>Pearson correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) provides good information about the closeness of the r...
The degree of inter-rater agreement is usually assessed through (Formula presented.) -type coefficie...
The aim of this study is to introduce weighted inter-rater agreement statistics used in ordinal scal...
Distribution of panelists’ levels of agreement with statements used in Round 3 and median scores.</p
<p><sup>1</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p>Inter-rater agreement of physician raters and C-AEP reviewers.</...
<p>Positive agreement denotes agreement regarding acceptance, negative agreement refers to agreement...
*<p>The combination of Clinician 1 (“A”) and Clinician 3 (“B”) together reviewed 2 batches of studie...
The top panel (A) shows the agreement between treatment arms among those who were more likely to agr...
Agreement between pairs of reviewers with respect to positive versus negative PET/CT by Qual4PS usin...
DOI
Add to ORKG