<p>Numbers in parentheses are standard deviations. A five-point ordinal scale (see “Qualitative analysis”) was used. P<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference between group polychromatic and Monochromatic (55 kev) images.</p
<p>Note: I – P = Differences in NRS ratings between the Imagery and Perception conditions. Standar...
Showing means and standard deviations of aesthetic judgements for selfies and egocentric images.</p
<p>The total of 160 images (80 original and 80 simulated) were presented to four radiologists. The f...
<p>Note: (1/2/3/4/5) represented the scores of indexes for subjective evaluation.</p><p>Comparison o...
Subjective image quality scores (mean±std) for different algorithms from a blind reader study.</p
<p>Overall scores of subjective image analysis (visually sharp anatomic reproduction and image quali...
<p>Note: a smaller score (1–4) represents a better subjective image quality.</p><p>Mean values of ra...
<p>Data are expressed as mean scores. *Value shows statistical difference. **Value was reported as f...
<p>Note: Small subgroup: Body Weight ≤ 5kg; Medium subgroup: 5 kg < Body Weight < 10kg; Large subgro...
<p>Subjective image scores of three groups in terms of all coronary artery segments.</p
Subjective image quality scores of reduced-dose CT compared with standard-dose CT*.</p
<p>Mean values (MV), standard deviations (SD) and confidence intervals (CI: 95%) from statements of ...
*<p>Pleasant foods (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0046362#s3...
Psychophysical scaling is commonly based on the assumption that the overall quality of images is bas...
Showing means and standard deviations for weight and attractiveness ratings for selfies and allocent...
<p>Note: I – P = Differences in NRS ratings between the Imagery and Perception conditions. Standar...
Showing means and standard deviations of aesthetic judgements for selfies and egocentric images.</p
<p>The total of 160 images (80 original and 80 simulated) were presented to four radiologists. The f...
<p>Note: (1/2/3/4/5) represented the scores of indexes for subjective evaluation.</p><p>Comparison o...
Subjective image quality scores (mean±std) for different algorithms from a blind reader study.</p
<p>Overall scores of subjective image analysis (visually sharp anatomic reproduction and image quali...
<p>Note: a smaller score (1–4) represents a better subjective image quality.</p><p>Mean values of ra...
<p>Data are expressed as mean scores. *Value shows statistical difference. **Value was reported as f...
<p>Note: Small subgroup: Body Weight ≤ 5kg; Medium subgroup: 5 kg < Body Weight < 10kg; Large subgro...
<p>Subjective image scores of three groups in terms of all coronary artery segments.</p
Subjective image quality scores of reduced-dose CT compared with standard-dose CT*.</p
<p>Mean values (MV), standard deviations (SD) and confidence intervals (CI: 95%) from statements of ...
*<p>Pleasant foods (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0046362#s3...
Psychophysical scaling is commonly based on the assumption that the overall quality of images is bas...
Showing means and standard deviations for weight and attractiveness ratings for selfies and allocent...
<p>Note: I – P = Differences in NRS ratings between the Imagery and Perception conditions. Standar...
Showing means and standard deviations of aesthetic judgements for selfies and egocentric images.</p
<p>The total of 160 images (80 original and 80 simulated) were presented to four radiologists. The f...
DOI
Add to ORKG