<p>Summarizes the distribution of the top 25 most abundant genera in symptomatic (red) and asymptomatic cases (blue) with their relative abundance data (depicted as bars) and prevalence values (given as numbers next to bars).</p
<p>Samples were categorized by depth or sediment source and the average abundance of each genus was ...
<p>Increasing taxonomic abundance is indicated by darker blue boxes. The horizontal color bar at the...
<p>Pie charts display the counts distribution of significantly different taxa. Line charts sort sign...
Relative abundance of 25 distinct genera (%) and Pearson’s correlations with different forage-to-con...
A. The bar graph of relative abundance for top 10 families in this study; B. The bar graph of relati...
<p>The heatmap color-coded bar plot depicts the relative abundance of each sample. The relative abun...
<p>Genera ordered by frequency of occurrence, with normalized representation and sequence counts (co...
<p>Prevalence of genera that are top ranked or detected in more than 25% of early-treatment sputum s...
<p>Pie charts display the counts distribution of significantly different taxa. Line charts sort sign...
<p>Samples color coded into four groupings calculated by 25% of the maximum relative abundance for e...
Relative sequence abundances of the six most abundant phyla, orders and genera across eleven samples...
<p>Distribution of taxonomic groups at various levels (including the core set of 23 genera) commonly...
<p>The 19 most abundant genera were sorted from bottom to top by descending overall relative abundan...
<p>The relative abundance is the mean relative biomass of the group. The percentage of occurrence is...
A. Distribution of the top 15 genus-level taxa averaged between the faecal samples. Relative abundan...
<p>Samples were categorized by depth or sediment source and the average abundance of each genus was ...
<p>Increasing taxonomic abundance is indicated by darker blue boxes. The horizontal color bar at the...
<p>Pie charts display the counts distribution of significantly different taxa. Line charts sort sign...
Relative abundance of 25 distinct genera (%) and Pearson’s correlations with different forage-to-con...
A. The bar graph of relative abundance for top 10 families in this study; B. The bar graph of relati...
<p>The heatmap color-coded bar plot depicts the relative abundance of each sample. The relative abun...
<p>Genera ordered by frequency of occurrence, with normalized representation and sequence counts (co...
<p>Prevalence of genera that are top ranked or detected in more than 25% of early-treatment sputum s...
<p>Pie charts display the counts distribution of significantly different taxa. Line charts sort sign...
<p>Samples color coded into four groupings calculated by 25% of the maximum relative abundance for e...
Relative sequence abundances of the six most abundant phyla, orders and genera across eleven samples...
<p>Distribution of taxonomic groups at various levels (including the core set of 23 genera) commonly...
<p>The 19 most abundant genera were sorted from bottom to top by descending overall relative abundan...
<p>The relative abundance is the mean relative biomass of the group. The percentage of occurrence is...
A. Distribution of the top 15 genus-level taxa averaged between the faecal samples. Relative abundan...
<p>Samples were categorized by depth or sediment source and the average abundance of each genus was ...
<p>Increasing taxonomic abundance is indicated by darker blue boxes. The horizontal color bar at the...
<p>Pie charts display the counts distribution of significantly different taxa. Line charts sort sign...