Predicted probability of direct contact among white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 as a function of day of year (1 January = 0) and landscape extent within which pairs are included for white-tailed deer in central New York.

Model-averaged detection probabilities of rusa deer.

Robert B. Allen (199239)
David M. Forsyth (538086)
Roy K. J. Allen (752985)
Kathrin Affeld (752986)
Darryl I. MacKenzie (606371)

June 2015

The model-averaged detection probabilities of rusa deer at locations without adult male rusa deer...

Predicted probability of encounter rate of groups (binned by size) for female (a) and male (b) elk with changes in population density in Riding Mountain National Park (2002–2005 and 2007–2009).

Eric Vander Wal (104846)
Floris M. van Beest (104847)
Ryan K. Brook (104851)

January 2013

Predicted probability of encounter rate of groups (binned by size) for female (a) and male (b) el...

The probability of killing roe deer or moose (± SE) by wolves in Scandinavia as related to local (intra-territorial) variation in roe deer density at kill sites (n = 365) at mean moose density (1.8 / km2).

Håkan Sand (274223)
Ann Eklund (3605297)
Barbara Zimmermann (2909579)
Camilla Wikenros (475603)
Petter Wabakken (274231)

December 2016

The stippled line (Y = 0.5) indicates equal probability for wolves to kill roe deer or moose. Dot...

Probability of direct contact among white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 as a function of day of year (1 January = 0).

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Lines represent functions fit to the data: constant contact probability (green), piecewise linear...

Spatial structure of direct contacts among white-tailed deer in central New York during 2006–2008.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Cumulative density function for probabilities of direct contact as a function of maximum observed...

Spatial structure of indirect contacts among white-tailed deer in central New York during 2006–2008.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Cumulative density function for probabilities of indirect contact as a function of maximum observ...

Model comparisons describing temporal dynamics of daily contact probability among deer pairs separated by <11 km in central New York.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Model comparisons describing temporal dynamics of daily contact probability among deer pairs sepa...

Regressions of observed versus predicted contact probabilities for k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) of models describing probability of contact as a function of time for white-tailed deer in central New York during 2006–2008: a) sine function predicting probability of direct contacts, b) piecewise linear threshold function describing probability of indirect contacts, and c) sine function predicting probability of indirect contacts.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Colors distinguish the points and regression lines of each cross-validation fold.</p

Informing disease models with temporal and spatial contact structure among GPS-collared individuals in wild populations.

David M Williams
Amy C Dechen Quinn
William F Porter

Contacts between hosts are essential for transmission of many infectious agents. Understanding how c...

Informing Disease Models with Temporal and Spatial Contact Structure among GPS-Collared Individuals in Wild

David M. Williams*¤a
Amy C. Dechen Quinn¤b
William F. Porter¤a

January 2013

Contacts between hosts are essential for transmission of many infectious agents. Understanding how c...

Sensitivity of the spatial structure of direct (black lines) and indirect (red lines) contacts to the distance criteria for defining contacts among white-tailed deer in central New York.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Sensitivity of the spatial structure of direct (black lines) and indirect (red lines) contacts to...

Fig 4 -

Joseph W. Hinton (12503633)
Jeremy E. Hurst (13531450)
David W. Kramer (13531453)
James H. Stickles (13531456)
Jacqueline L. Frair (7065029)

August 2022

A) Predicted white-tailed deer density (individuals/km2) for 1 km2 grids across the Adirondack Park,...

Histograms of landscape extents (m) separating individual pairings of white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 for all pairings (light gray, n = 2,486), pairings exhibiting indirect contact (medium gray, n = 257), and pairings with direct contact (dark gray, n = 133).

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

We defined the landscape extent as the maximum observed distance separating each pair irrespectiv...

Predicted badger visitation rate (proportion of nights badgers observed) in relation to the maximum cattle capacity on the farm and the distance to the nearest active badger sett.

Andrew Robertson (291907)
Joanna Judge (6733682)
G. J. Wilson (6733685)
Ian J. Vernon (6733688)
Richard J. Delahay (112221)
Robbie A. McDonald (112224)

May 2019

Bold lines represent the marginal predicted probability and dashed lines (or error bars) the standar...

Characteristics (rank correlation, regression, and goodness-of-fit) of the accuracy of each fold for 5-fold cross validation of selected models predicting temporal contact probabilities among deer in central New York.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

a Significantly different from 0.0.b Significantly different from 1....

Model-averaged detection probabilities of rusa deer.

Robert B. Allen (199239)
David M. Forsyth (538086)
Roy K. J. Allen (752985)
Kathrin Affeld (752986)
Darryl I. MacKenzie (606371)

June 2015

The model-averaged detection probabilities of rusa deer at locations without adult male rusa deer...

Predicted probability of encounter rate of groups (binned by size) for female (a) and male (b) elk with changes in population density in Riding Mountain National Park (2002–2005 and 2007–2009).

Eric Vander Wal (104846)
Floris M. van Beest (104847)
Ryan K. Brook (104851)

January 2013

Predicted probability of encounter rate of groups (binned by size) for female (a) and male (b) el...

The probability of killing roe deer or moose (± SE) by wolves in Scandinavia as related to local (intra-territorial) variation in roe deer density at kill sites (n = 365) at mean moose density (1.8 / km2).

Håkan Sand (274223)
Ann Eklund (3605297)
Barbara Zimmermann (2909579)
Camilla Wikenros (475603)
Petter Wabakken (274231)

December 2016

The stippled line (Y = 0.5) indicates equal probability for wolves to kill roe deer or moose. Dot...

Probability of direct contact among white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 as a function of day of year (1 January = 0).

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Lines represent functions fit to the data: constant contact probability (green), piecewise linear...

Spatial structure of direct contacts among white-tailed deer in central New York during 2006–2008.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Cumulative density function for probabilities of direct contact as a function of maximum observed...

Spatial structure of indirect contacts among white-tailed deer in central New York during 2006–2008.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Cumulative density function for probabilities of indirect contact as a function of maximum observ...

Model comparisons describing temporal dynamics of daily contact probability among deer pairs separated by <11 km in central New York.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Model comparisons describing temporal dynamics of daily contact probability among deer pairs sepa...

Regressions of observed versus predicted contact probabilities for k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) of models describing probability of contact as a function of time for white-tailed deer in central New York during 2006–2008: a) sine function predicting probability of direct contacts, b) piecewise linear threshold function describing probability of indirect contacts, and c) sine function predicting probability of indirect contacts.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Colors distinguish the points and regression lines of each cross-validation fold.</p

Informing disease models with temporal and spatial contact structure among GPS-collared individuals in wild populations.

David M Williams
Amy C Dechen Quinn
William F Porter

Contacts between hosts are essential for transmission of many infectious agents. Understanding how c...

Informing Disease Models with Temporal and Spatial Contact Structure among GPS-Collared Individuals in Wild

David M. Williams*¤a
Amy C. Dechen Quinn¤b
William F. Porter¤a

January 2013

Contacts between hosts are essential for transmission of many infectious agents. Understanding how c...

Sensitivity of the spatial structure of direct (black lines) and indirect (red lines) contacts to the distance criteria for defining contacts among white-tailed deer in central New York.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

Sensitivity of the spatial structure of direct (black lines) and indirect (red lines) contacts to...

Fig 4 -

Joseph W. Hinton (12503633)
Jeremy E. Hurst (13531450)
David W. Kramer (13531453)
James H. Stickles (13531456)
Jacqueline L. Frair (7065029)

August 2022

A) Predicted white-tailed deer density (individuals/km2) for 1 km2 grids across the Adirondack Park,...

Histograms of landscape extents (m) separating individual pairings of white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 for all pairings (light gray, n = 2,486), pairings exhibiting indirect contact (medium gray, n = 257), and pairings with direct contact (dark gray, n = 133).

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

We defined the landscape extent as the maximum observed distance separating each pair irrespectiv...

Predicted badger visitation rate (proportion of nights badgers observed) in relation to the maximum cattle capacity on the farm and the distance to the nearest active badger sett.

Andrew Robertson (291907)
Joanna Judge (6733682)
G. J. Wilson (6733685)
Ian J. Vernon (6733688)
Richard J. Delahay (112221)
Robbie A. McDonald (112224)

May 2019

Bold lines represent the marginal predicted probability and dashed lines (or error bars) the standar...

Characteristics (rank correlation, regression, and goodness-of-fit) of the accuracy of each fold for 5-fold cross validation of selected models predicting temporal contact probabilities among deer in central New York.

David M. Williams (16225)
Amy C. Dechen Quinn (506292)
William F. Porter (299813)

January 2014

a Significantly different from 0.0.b Significantly different from 1....

Model-averaged detection probabilities of rusa deer.

Robert B. Allen (199239)
David M. Forsyth (538086)
Roy K. J. Allen (752985)
Kathrin Affeld (752986)
Darryl I. MacKenzie (606371)

June 2015

The model-averaged detection probabilities of rusa deer at locations without adult male rusa deer...

Predicted probability of encounter rate of groups (binned by size) for female (a) and male (b) elk with changes in population density in Riding Mountain National Park (2002–2005 and 2007–2009).

Eric Vander Wal (104846)
Floris M. van Beest (104847)
Ryan K. Brook (104851)

January 2013

Predicted probability of encounter rate of groups (binned by size) for female (a) and male (b) el...

The probability of killing roe deer or moose (± SE) by wolves in Scandinavia as related to local (intra-territorial) variation in roe deer density at kill sites (n = 365) at mean moose density (1.8 / km2).

Håkan Sand (274223)
Ann Eklund (3605297)
Barbara Zimmermann (2909579)
Camilla Wikenros (475603)
Petter Wabakken (274231)

December 2016

The stippled line (Y = 0.5) indicates equal probability for wolves to kill roe deer or moose. Dot...

Predicted probability of direct contact among white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 as a function of day of year (1 January = 0) and landscape extent within which pairs are included for white-tailed deer in central New York.

Abstract

Extracted data

Predicted probability of direct contact among white-tailed deer across central New York State during 2006–2008 as a function of day of year (1 January = 0) and landscape extent within which pairs are included for white-tailed deer in central New York.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items