<p>Average prevalence of the twenty most prevalent bacterial genera for each different group of samples (1 = healthy quarter, somatic cell count < 20.000; 2 = healthy quarter, somatic cell count ranged from 21,000 to 50,000; 3 = healthy quarter, somatic cell count >50,000; 4 = subclinical culture positive quarters, somatic cell count >400,000; 5 = mastitis quarter culture negative quarters).</p
#<p>Relative abundance given by mean ± SE.</p><p>***<i>P</i> = <0.001 (t-test).</p><p>Identification...
<p>All values are presented as percentages. RA = Relative Abundance.</p><p>*Reporting for <i>Lactoba...
<p>Only the genera frequency higher than 1% was listed in the table. Values are the means followed b...
<p>OTUs are listed on the left according their occurrence observed with deep sequencing. Bacteria pr...
<p>Presence (%) and differences in the relative abundance of bacterial families/genera and fungal or...
<p>Prevalence of all bacteria that were not identified at species level (uncultured bacteria) were s...
<p>+, ++ and +++ indicate that the genus is significantly abundant in samples with normal clinical v...
<p>Prevalence of genera that are top ranked or detected in more than 25% of early-treatment sputum s...
<p>Prevalence of bacteria identified in the positive blood cultures in the CONTROL group (n = 46 iso...
<p>Pre and 1Week time points comparisons. Median relative abundance ≥ 0.5%. (a) Actinobacteria, Prot...
<p>Percentage of samples in each Phylum with antimicrobial bioactivity greater than the threshold (o...
<p>Distribution of the genera as a percentage of the total number of identified 16S sequences in ind...
<p>Prevalence (%) of bacterial species obtained from oral or nasopharyngeal swabs.</p
<p>5-weekly smoothed prevalence (%) of enteropathogens of bacterial (2A), parasitic (2B) and viral (...
†<p>Percentage of women with genital microbiota having ≥1% of sequences corresponding to each genus ...
#<p>Relative abundance given by mean ± SE.</p><p>***<i>P</i> = <0.001 (t-test).</p><p>Identification...
<p>All values are presented as percentages. RA = Relative Abundance.</p><p>*Reporting for <i>Lactoba...
<p>Only the genera frequency higher than 1% was listed in the table. Values are the means followed b...
<p>OTUs are listed on the left according their occurrence observed with deep sequencing. Bacteria pr...
<p>Presence (%) and differences in the relative abundance of bacterial families/genera and fungal or...
<p>Prevalence of all bacteria that were not identified at species level (uncultured bacteria) were s...
<p>+, ++ and +++ indicate that the genus is significantly abundant in samples with normal clinical v...
<p>Prevalence of genera that are top ranked or detected in more than 25% of early-treatment sputum s...
<p>Prevalence of bacteria identified in the positive blood cultures in the CONTROL group (n = 46 iso...
<p>Pre and 1Week time points comparisons. Median relative abundance ≥ 0.5%. (a) Actinobacteria, Prot...
<p>Percentage of samples in each Phylum with antimicrobial bioactivity greater than the threshold (o...
<p>Distribution of the genera as a percentage of the total number of identified 16S sequences in ind...
<p>Prevalence (%) of bacterial species obtained from oral or nasopharyngeal swabs.</p
<p>5-weekly smoothed prevalence (%) of enteropathogens of bacterial (2A), parasitic (2B) and viral (...
†<p>Percentage of women with genital microbiota having ≥1% of sequences corresponding to each genus ...
#<p>Relative abundance given by mean ± SE.</p><p>***<i>P</i> = <0.001 (t-test).</p><p>Identification...
<p>All values are presented as percentages. RA = Relative Abundance.</p><p>*Reporting for <i>Lactoba...
<p>Only the genera frequency higher than 1% was listed in the table. Values are the means followed b...