<p>Analysis indicated a significant main group effect ranging from 460-posterior channels. A. Topography of TFCE statistics for the main effect of group at 500 ms Red areas indicate higher statistical differences. B. ERP waveforms from three distinct regions of the scalp for the entire time range of the ERP. Black bars over the ERP indicate significant time points for this channel whereas yellow and red areas in the TFCE<sub>F</sub> topography indicate significant channels. C. Individual topographical maps below indicate similar ERP topographies for all groups at 500 ms, however the Parkinson's group showed significantly lower amplitudes.</p
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Crossmodal attention effects on brain responses t...
<p>A) Grand average waveforms of the occipital midline electrode (Oz) displaying the P1 Group effect...
<p>A, B. For the first and last step of the procedure, waveforms are displayed in the three right-ha...
<p>Top section shows the early condition differences (peaking at 110 ms and 170 ms), in a representa...
<p>Average amplitudes are shown for a right cento-frontal region of interest at 270 ms post-feedback...
<p>Reward feedback could indicate a successful or unsuccessful trial. Significant differences were f...
<p>No significant differences were found for either the group comparisons (12 participants in each g...
<p>(A) ERPs in SELF, CLOSE and FAMOUS conditions in HSE (panel A left) and LSE groups (panel A right...
This work had the following objectives: i) to integrate temporal analysis (N30 peak) with power-spec...
<p>Statistical analysis yielded no significant channels or time points for the duration of the ERP. ...
(A) Group averaged ERPs ± standard error are shown at frontal (F3, F4) and parietal (P3, P4) channel...
<div><p>(A) ERPs associated with chosen (magenta) and non-chosen (blue) stimuli, averaged across int...
Late components of the event-related potential (ERP; N100, P200, N200, and P300) were elicited using...
<p>upper panels present response to face stimuli, bottom panels present response to name stimuli, wi...
<p>Grand average event-related potentials (ERP) in the ASD group vs. the control group, presented se...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Crossmodal attention effects on brain responses t...
<p>A) Grand average waveforms of the occipital midline electrode (Oz) displaying the P1 Group effect...
<p>A, B. For the first and last step of the procedure, waveforms are displayed in the three right-ha...
<p>Top section shows the early condition differences (peaking at 110 ms and 170 ms), in a representa...
<p>Average amplitudes are shown for a right cento-frontal region of interest at 270 ms post-feedback...
<p>Reward feedback could indicate a successful or unsuccessful trial. Significant differences were f...
<p>No significant differences were found for either the group comparisons (12 participants in each g...
<p>(A) ERPs in SELF, CLOSE and FAMOUS conditions in HSE (panel A left) and LSE groups (panel A right...
This work had the following objectives: i) to integrate temporal analysis (N30 peak) with power-spec...
<p>Statistical analysis yielded no significant channels or time points for the duration of the ERP. ...
(A) Group averaged ERPs ± standard error are shown at frontal (F3, F4) and parietal (P3, P4) channel...
<div><p>(A) ERPs associated with chosen (magenta) and non-chosen (blue) stimuli, averaged across int...
Late components of the event-related potential (ERP; N100, P200, N200, and P300) were elicited using...
<p>upper panels present response to face stimuli, bottom panels present response to name stimuli, wi...
<p>Grand average event-related potentials (ERP) in the ASD group vs. the control group, presented se...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Crossmodal attention effects on brain responses t...
<p>A) Grand average waveforms of the occipital midline electrode (Oz) displaying the P1 Group effect...
<p>A, B. For the first and last step of the procedure, waveforms are displayed in the three right-ha...