<p>Values are means ± SEM and range; n = 6 rats/group. BW, body weight.</p>*<p>indicates a statistically significant difference betwenn groups (p<0.001).</p
<p>Values are the mean ± sem of six different animals. Statistical significance of the differences b...
<p>(<b>A–F</b>) Data from the dissection groups as stated in the graph titles. The graphs show group...
*<p><sup>,</sup> **significant different from the corresponding value in OVX group.</p>#<p>significa...
<p>Values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). # indicates a significant difference, p ...
<p>Each value is expressed as mean ±SD (n = 10). Significance difference between control and treatme...
<p>Values are mean±SEM of 12 animals in each group.</p>*<p>p<0.05 vs. GK control;</p>**<p>p<0.01 vs....
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.</p><p>*<i>P</i><0.05,</p><p>**<i>P</i><0.01 for SL vs. NL. <i>n...
<p>N = 6 in all groups. %BW = percentage of body weight. Statistical comparisons between groups (two...
<p>The body weights (mean<i>±</i>SD) of each group of rats (n = 10 per group) recorded weekly are sh...
*<p>p<0.01, **p<0.001 <i>versus</i> control group. +p<0.01, ++p<0.001 <i>versus</i> Cispt3.5 group. ...
<p>Values are means ± SEM and range; n = 6 rats/group. BW, body weight.</p>*<p>indicates a statistic...
<p>Body weight (A) and uterus index (B) changes measured using an electronic scale. *P<0.01 compared...
<p>Data are presented as means ± SEM for 8 rats in each group. **P<0.01, statistically significant c...
<p>Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis On...
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and analyzed using unpaired student’s T test at P<0.05. At ...
<p>Values are the mean ± sem of six different animals. Statistical significance of the differences b...
<p>(<b>A–F</b>) Data from the dissection groups as stated in the graph titles. The graphs show group...
*<p><sup>,</sup> **significant different from the corresponding value in OVX group.</p>#<p>significa...
<p>Values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). # indicates a significant difference, p ...
<p>Each value is expressed as mean ±SD (n = 10). Significance difference between control and treatme...
<p>Values are mean±SEM of 12 animals in each group.</p>*<p>p<0.05 vs. GK control;</p>**<p>p<0.01 vs....
<p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.</p><p>*<i>P</i><0.05,</p><p>**<i>P</i><0.01 for SL vs. NL. <i>n...
<p>N = 6 in all groups. %BW = percentage of body weight. Statistical comparisons between groups (two...
<p>The body weights (mean<i>±</i>SD) of each group of rats (n = 10 per group) recorded weekly are sh...
*<p>p<0.01, **p<0.001 <i>versus</i> control group. +p<0.01, ++p<0.001 <i>versus</i> Cispt3.5 group. ...
<p>Values are means ± SEM and range; n = 6 rats/group. BW, body weight.</p>*<p>indicates a statistic...
<p>Body weight (A) and uterus index (B) changes measured using an electronic scale. *P<0.01 compared...
<p>Data are presented as means ± SEM for 8 rats in each group. **P<0.01, statistically significant c...
<p>Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis On...
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and analyzed using unpaired student’s T test at P<0.05. At ...
<p>Values are the mean ± sem of six different animals. Statistical significance of the differences b...
<p>(<b>A–F</b>) Data from the dissection groups as stated in the graph titles. The graphs show group...
*<p><sup>,</sup> **significant different from the corresponding value in OVX group.</p>#<p>significa...
DOI
Add to ORKG