Add to ORKGFolksonomies provide a free source of keywords describing web resources; however, these keywords are free form and their semantics spans multiple contextual dimension. In this paper, we present a pragmatic experiment that analyzes folksonomy tags using three classification categories: Personal, Factual and Subjective, in order to gain more understanding of the types of tags used in the social tagging process. The rational for this work was to measure the potential portion of folksonomy tags that might be helpful when considering the creation of structured metadata
1. Research Context and previous work Recently, a growing amount of systems that allow personal cont...
Social bookmarking sites such as Flickr, del.icio.us, and CiteULike have adopted folksonomic system...
Folksonomies are unsystematic, unsophisticated collections of keywords associated by social bookmark...
Despite increasing interest in folksonomy in practice as well as in research, little has been done t...
Finding good keywords to describe resources is an on-going problem: typically we select such words m...
This paper describes a three-level structure of folksonomies that accounts for the aggregation of t...
Folksonomies provide a free source of keywords describing web resources, however, these keywords are...
Social tagging to annotate resources represents one of the innovative aspects introduced with Web 2....
Folksonomies have the potential to add much value to public library catalogues by enabling clients t...
This paper provides insight into main approaches t o studying folksonomy based on its tripartite str...
In our daily lives, organizing resources like books or web pages into a set of categories to ease fu...
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Web Semantics: Science, ...
Metadata technology allowing users to create and modify their own personal descriptive metadata for ...
Social tagging systems allow users to easily cre-ate, organize and share collections of resources (e...
Folksonomies are social collaborative systems which represent a method of self- organisation, where ...
1. Research Context and previous work Recently, a growing amount of systems that allow personal cont...
Social bookmarking sites such as Flickr, del.icio.us, and CiteULike have adopted folksonomic system...
Folksonomies are unsystematic, unsophisticated collections of keywords associated by social bookmark...
Despite increasing interest in folksonomy in practice as well as in research, little has been done t...
Finding good keywords to describe resources is an on-going problem: typically we select such words m...
This paper describes a three-level structure of folksonomies that accounts for the aggregation of t...
Folksonomies provide a free source of keywords describing web resources, however, these keywords are...
Social tagging to annotate resources represents one of the innovative aspects introduced with Web 2....
Folksonomies have the potential to add much value to public library catalogues by enabling clients t...
This paper provides insight into main approaches t o studying folksonomy based on its tripartite str...
In our daily lives, organizing resources like books or web pages into a set of categories to ease fu...
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Web Semantics: Science, ...
Metadata technology allowing users to create and modify their own personal descriptive metadata for ...
Social tagging systems allow users to easily cre-ate, organize and share collections of resources (e...
Folksonomies are social collaborative systems which represent a method of self- organisation, where ...
1. Research Context and previous work Recently, a growing amount of systems that allow personal cont...
Social bookmarking sites such as Flickr, del.icio.us, and CiteULike have adopted folksonomic system...
Folksonomies are unsystematic, unsophisticated collections of keywords associated by social bookmark...